whats more difficult to overcome?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • talip bin osman
    spider jerusalem!
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Feb 2009
    • 4256
    • 193
    • 65
    • 14,329

    #1

    whats more difficult to overcome?

    whats more difficult to overcome? your foe's physical superiority (size, speed, power) or his style? can u give some examples to support ur answer?
  • The_Demon
    Big dog
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jan 2009
    • 13604
    • 1,354
    • 888
    • 22,971

    #2
    id say style more often than not,just trying too come up with a few examples for ya

    Comment

    • Sir Tom Jones
      It's Not Unusual.
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2008
      • 3493
      • 264
      • 582
      • 12,867

      #3
      my first reaction was style.

      Comment

      • roe
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Oct 2008
        • 133
        • 7
        • 0
        • 6,260

        #4
        Physical superiority is harder to overcome for obvious reasons. If someone is bigger, stronger, faster and generally better than you.. you'd need an amazing tactical plan and have to catch your opponent on an off night. A recent example I guess would be Mayweather - Marquez.

        Of course certain styles can be tricky ie southpaws etc but there's normally a way to squeeze past them.

        Comment

        • talip bin osman
          spider jerusalem!
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Feb 2009
          • 4256
          • 193
          • 65
          • 14,329

          #5
          Originally posted by roe
          Physical superiority is harder to overcome for obvious reasons. If someone is bigger, stronger, faster and generally better than you.. you'd need an amazing tactical plan and have to catch your opponent on an off night. A recent example I guess would be Mayweather - Marquez.

          Of course certain styles can be tricky ie southpaws etc but there's normally a way to squeeze past them.
          can u still remember duran-barkley?

          duran was 38 then... way past it already...

          in front of him was a man big enough to be a light heavy weight...

          stronger, younger & faster...

          but that man's style was just tailor made for him...

          he defeated that man & walked away a middleweight title holder...

          Comment

          • RightCross94
            Banned
            • Apr 2009
            • 2899
            • 158
            • 150
            • 3,933

            #6
            Both are tough, but nothing is more purely frustrating than a bad style matchup.

            Even as a boxer myself, last week i fought a fast, awkward explosive sort of fighter who would leap in from long range and zip back out, he also had slick defence and was generally impossible to try and outbox

            me being a counterpuncher type, just bad news, dude was too fast and unpredictable to time and i tried opening up and going after him but since i dont normally fight that way i was just not effective doing that.

            so yeah bad style matchups are often quite tough to overcome.

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP