Carl Froch vs. Mikkel Kessler: who will win?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • incredibleman
    Banned
    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
    • Dec 2009
    • 50
    • 6
    • 2
    • 6,078

    #31
    As bad as they looked in their last fight, I might be leaning towards Froch winning the actual fight. But since it might be in Denmark, they might give it to Kessler by decision.

    Comment

    • deadbeat hero
      Contender
      • Dec 2008
      • 472
      • 40
      • 0
      • 6,585

      #32
      This tournament is in need of a great fight, the first round of fights were enjoyable enough but not edge of the seat stuff by any means. Realistically, I think Froch/Kessler is the best chance we've got of a real humdinger that is going to live long in the memory.

      I think the fight is too close to call, but I just have a sneaky feeling about Froch. He's the kind of **** that will pull this **** off.

      Comment

      • Shattered Jaw
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Apr 2009
        • 5131
        • 261
        • 141
        • 11,649

        #33
        People would still pick Taylor to beat Froch in a rematch? What a joke. That fight was close on press row going to the last round and a SD on the judges cards. Not only that but Froch literally beat Jermain around the ring for 2.5 mins, stalked him like an animal and just brutalised him.

        Comment

        • deuce_drop
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jun 2004
          • 5434
          • 263
          • 320
          • 13,572

          #34
          i think froch's style plays into kesslers style, i think andre ward's style was too confusing for kessler, froch is more straight up and down, also he stand right in front of his opponents, his guard is down always, a focused kessler working off his jab should have no trouble with out pointing froch, unless kessler's head is messed up from losing to ward.......

          really good fight, and a good chance for kessler to get back on the winning side of things.

          Comment

          • Black Zombie
            Banned
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Dec 2009
            • 179
            • 5
            • 19
            • 264

            #35
            Froch will roughhouse Kessler...

            Comment

            • Pullcounter
              no guts no glory
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jan 2004
              • 42582
              • 549
              • 191
              • 49,739

              #36
              the only way froch wins is if the UK ref allows froch to rough-house kessler and the UK judges give him the fight.

              Comment

              • £-4-£
                Liverpool FC
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jul 2009
                • 2750
                • 165
                • 319
                • 28,401

                #37
                Froch has a solid chin, fair enough he's been hurt and knocked down before, but I don't think Kessler has it in him to KO Froch. Kessler will win by UD, but it'll be a fairly close fight e.g. 115-113.

                Comment

                • The Hammer
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 50797
                  • 3,416
                  • 8,704
                  • 58,851

                  #38
                  This one could go either way, but I think Kessler will connect more often and win a decision.

                  Comment

                  • Porter's Dad
                    Banned
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Dec 2007
                    • 6831
                    • 659
                    • 84
                    • 19,977

                    #39
                    I'd honestly be shocked in anything other than a Kessler victory.

                    Comment

                    • SKULLSPLITTER
                      Banned
                      • Feb 2009
                      • 104
                      • 26
                      • 3
                      • 141

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Carnivore
                      They're actually both very good B+ or A- fighters. Kessler is the better boxer, but Froch is the tougher more determined fighter.

                      And the super-middleweight division is loaded with talent: Abraham, Dirrell, Bute, Ward, Taylor, Kessler, and Froch. Even the fringe contenders like Bika, Green and Inkin are decent.
                      No.....no.

                      168 is a division chock full of guys all around the same level...B AND C level...there is not ONE ELITE fighter in that division....which just so happens to be The Story of Super Middleweight.

                      so calling Froch and Kessler B+/A- is asinine...you wanna know why?

                      Andre Ward is currently the most talented boxer at Super Middleweight, and he's only a B+ fighter....and as everyone saw...he was at LEAST one full grade better than the former, recognized, best Super Middle in Kessler....

                      So what does that make Kessler?...yeah...a C+.

                      Abraham, Bute, Dirrell...all of them are Bs as of right now...everyone else you mentioned are B- or less...

                      Froch is long in the tooth, worn, and on his way out...the Dirrell fight proved that...so that why he's a C+ right now.

                      So yes...like I originally said...it doesn't matter who wins this fight....this fight is basically two very average fighters fighting each other in a deep, very average division.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP