Mayweather Amateur Fights... Not a ZERO after all...

[project xxx1]

just another hater,so sad dude:gay:

[Pullcounter]

if being undefeated is the measure of greatness, then calz > pbf, because he has a better undefeated record than pbf...

obviously, being undefeated merely means that you haven't challenged yourself

[project xxx1]

if being undefeated is the measure of greatness, then calz > pbf, because he has a better undefeated record than pbf...

obviously, being undefeated merely means that you haven't challenged yourself

thats your opinion dude,but calazge hasnt won titles in 5 divisions and remained undefeated,if pbf beats pac will he be the best then?

[El Jesus]

[.Sakuragi.]

Pro career is different than Amateur, Stop the Hate people!

[tesla_power]

eah but the competition he was fighting as a 16-18 year old amateur wasbetter than the guys manny was fighting
remeber pro isnt always better top amateurs are better than most pros

Can we really tell that pbf's competition is better than Manny's? As for the bold, you can make a case but Top Pros are better than Top amateurs.

[RightCross94]

It is impossible to be undefeated in the amateurs today. Absolutely impossible.

[Kalion]

Anyone has a complete list of Floyd's Amateur fights?

I just realized one thing...

i remembered Floyd was talking about he was also fighting the same weight with Pac started at 16 years old.

Let's say both Pacquiao and Mayweather started fighting at the same weight. So we need to add in Mayweather's record on the amateurs. If this is the case then he doesn't have a "ZERO".

Mayweather has 6 loses..


Floyd started Pro in 1996.
Pac started Pro in 1995 at 16 years old.

What if Floyd started at 1995? yeah right, he still has loses. See his records above...

You my friend are in desperate need of something to love.

[Check]

You can't assume that the losses Mayweather had in the am's is an automatic loss in the pros. Pro boxing is not the same as am boxing. You fail.

[-Boxzilla-]

pretty desperate hate thread ... fail