I am saying that is not fit. If that is your idea of a fit athlete, please join me at the gym.
You're stretching GG Marquez, and you know it. The pic was taken during off season, when Pacman wasn't training for a fight. I know bias can blind people, but Floyd fans like you aren't just blind. Your hating, and the only possible reason for that is because the guy is outshining your boy Money.
I am saying that is not fit. If that is your idea of a fit athlete, please join me at the gym.
You're smoking then. No moron would believe that is obese. Also, this has absolutely nothing to do with the discussion. All fighters get soft when not training or hurt. Cotto said he went up to 190 when he was injured. Pacquiao by no means is unfit.
You're smoking then. No moron would believe that is obese. Also, this has absolutely nothing to do with the discussion. All fighters get soft when not training or hurt. Cotto said he went up to 190 when he was injured. Pacquiao by no means is unfit.
Cool. And to underscore your point, I just simply asked you for a photo of Floyd looking similar.
You're smoking then. No moron would believe that is obese. Also, this has absolutely nothing to do with the discussion. All fighters get soft when not training or hurt. Cotto said he went up to 190 when he was injured. Pacquiao by no means is unfit.
Obese is Buster Douglas. Maybe Arreola. Pac there was just "doughy".
Look at Shane. He hasn't fought in a year. Hopkins is 45. Been off over a year (until last week). Look at Floyd. Look at Bradley. Look at Roy (40+)
Obese is Buster Douglas. Maybe Arreola. Pac there was just "doughy".
Look at Shane. He hasn't fought in a year. Hopkins is 45. Been off over a year (until last week). Look at Floyd. Look at Bradley. Look at Roy (40+)
THEY HAVE CLOTHES ON. Okay, Al, when was the last time you saw Shane, Bradely without a shirt during the off-season??!?! That's why you asked me a picture of Floyd. Are you all there? That picture of Pacquiao was by no means "doughy". If you can get me a pic of one of those guys you mentioned--it'll be great. Thanks.
You present "proof" that nobody but you accepts as proof so that you can slander the career of a champion. That's not discussion, *****, that's slander, and someone has to call you out for it.
Comment