Khan's resume?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • josenoway
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2005
    • 2195
    • 95
    • 8
    • 8,612

    #11
    why not start clearing out 140?

    Comment

    • Squirrel
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Aug 2008
      • 1363
      • 63
      • 59
      • 7,704

      #12
      Names wise it's ok for his age. For a titlist it's ****, though.

      If you look past the names and take note of how he had the absolute **** caned out of him by a guy who's gone on to be incredibly limited and pretty awful, struggled against significantly older fighters who spent their careers one or two weight classes below him, his dull-as-dishwater title-fight against a guy even he named as "the worst champion ever", and how he's struggled and been decked against some of the aforementioned people even with his massive height, reach, speed and home-town/referee advantages, it suffers even more.

      He's certainly on the up, but thus far I am really not impressed with him.

      Comment

      • Ray*
        Be safe!!!
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jul 2005
        • 44867
        • 1,654
        • 1,608
        • 558,890

        #13
        Originally posted by tehMatrix
        hattons record is'nt that bad

        At 26 years ago please tell me who he fought??? Not now but when he was coming up like Khan was coming up now..

        Comment

        • PensionKiller
          Khan Kills Kell
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Sep 2009
          • 9521
          • 224
          • 207
          • 18,489

          #14
          Originally posted by Squirrel
          Names wise it's ok for his age. For a titlist it's ****, though.

          If you look past the names and take note of how he had the absolute **** caned out of him by a guy who's gone on to be incredibly limited and pretty awful, struggled against significantly older fighters who spent their careers one or two weight classes below him, his dull-as-dishwater title-fight against a guy even he named as "the worst champion ever", and how he's struggled and been decked against some of the aforementioned people even with his massive height, reach, speed and home-town/referee advantages, it suffers even more.

          He's certainly on the up, but thus far I am really not impressed with him.
          If Khan fights at 140 for the first time for a world title trying to **** and loses, then he still gets no credit but abuse. Also he has no title.

          Prescott was a **** fight fohim but it has been a blessing.

          As for the past fights, he was inexperienced vs guys who had it, and ofcourse flaws show. His skills may be above them but for being so young, you do make mistakes. He also was with a trainer who isn't great as freddie is. Right now he beats everyone he has fought but much worse, including Prescott.

          A good coach makes a big difference. Every top sports team pays good money for good coaches and managers.

          At 140 he seems comfortable making weight.

          Comment

          • The Great Shark
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 3542
            • 295
            • 466
            • 4,021

            #15
            The only reason he has a win against Barrera is because of the hometown bull**** referees, allowing the grotesque cut go past four rounds to give him the W.

            Comment

            • Titing Kabayo
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Dec 2007
              • 2971
              • 65
              • 26
              • 9,468

              #16
              Khan is HOF 5 years from now and will be ATG for another 3 years... Too early to judge and say he is poor or bum...

              Comment

              • hammerhiem
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • May 2008
                • 4877
                • 129
                • 102
                • 11,163

                #17
                Originally posted by ma51f
                Gomez/Limmond were good wins, as were Barrera, Salita and St Calair
                Gomez is a featherweight at best, Limmond is a featherfisted nobody, Barerra was shot 3 years ago and thats being conservative, St Clair was coming off 2 losses from 3 at Superfeather.

                Do you know ANYTHING about boxing? sheesh.

                Comment

                • £-4-£
                  Liverpool FC
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jul 2009
                  • 2750
                  • 165
                  • 319
                  • 28,401

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Ray`
                  For a 22 year old british fighter it has to be on par if not better than Naz's resume, Hatton has to have the worst record even at 26 years old, Calzaghe's isnt that much at the same age, And Haye was still a novice at 22 so go figure.
                  Naz's resume wasn't that good, Hatton's was crap until he fought Tszyu, Maussa, Urango etc..

                  Khan's resume is pretty decent for a 22 y.o. Graham Earl, Willie Limond, Barrera (over the hill though), Kotelnik (people don't give him enough credit for beating Maidana), and now Salita (who was more sheltered than Khan, but nevertheless 30-0-1 is a good record).

                  Comment

                  • MOTHER DUCKER
                    Banned
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • May 2009
                    • 7402
                    • 261
                    • 177
                    • 8,407

                    #19
                    Originally posted by £-4-£
                    Naz's resume wasn't that good, Hatton's was crap until he fought Tszyu, Maussa, Urango etc..

                    Khan's resume is pretty decent for a 22 y.o. Graham Earl, Willie Limond, Barrera (over the hill though), Kotelnik (people don't give him enough credit for beating Maidana), and now Salita (who was more sheltered than Khan, but nevertheless 30-0-1 is a good record).
                    Naz at the age of 22 resume wasn't the greatest but he has a pretty damn underated resume overall imo. Khan is a 22yr old silver medalist/World Champ who has fought some decent fighters you can't say much more really. He showed grit/determination to bounce back from the humiliation of the Presscott KO.

                    Beating Klotenik, Salita, Barrera (im 100% sure cut or no cut he would) he is looking very decent for 22 and i don't see many fighters of this era with a better resume at 22..

                    Comment

                    • ma51f
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 2474
                      • 131
                      • 154
                      • 8,700

                      #20
                      Originally posted by hammerhiem
                      Gomez is a featherweight at best, Limmond is a featherfisted nobody, Barerra was shot 3 years ago and thats being conservative, St Clair was coming off 2 losses from 3 at Superfeather.

                      Do you know ANYTHING about boxing? sheesh.
                      at that point in Khan's career they wer pretty good fights.

                      ive read loads of your comments about Khan, some racist and some just point blank ignorant. your full of crap, im just gonig to ignore you from now on

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP