This fight was not a robbery
Collapse
-
Comment
-
-
-
1- Martinez
2-Martinez
3-Martinez
4-Williams
5- Williams
6- Williams
7-Williams
8-Martinez
9-Williams
10-Martinez
11-Williams
12-Williams
115-113 Williams is how I scored it. I thought round 11 could've went either way but I gave it to Williams because Martinez seemed like he was holding on for dear life.Comment
-
It's not about Paul Williams winning, it's about the judge deciding before the fight even started Sergio Martinez was losing! That's the only way a judge for a professional boxing match of this magnitude can score THAT fight THAT way.Comment
-
-
When a judge scores a fight like that by that wide a margin, he was never going to give the fight to the person who lost no matter what happened. That means the fighter who won had a judge giving him the fight before it even started. That means the fighter who lost was robbed. This has nothing to do with whether Paul Williams deserved to win, it was a close fight, either fighter could be considered the winner. One judge decided he was giving the fight to Paul Williams no matter what, that means Sergio Martinez was ROBBED.Comment
-
Please stop crying. Both man fought their hearts and both deserved to win the fight. Therefore before the decision i said i would be satisfied if either won the bout. But once again one bad scorecard makes everyone **** their pants and makes them scream robbery. Bad scorecard yes, robbery no. Could have gone to either man.Comment
-
Comment