Tweet
i had it a draw and have no problem w/ either man winning but one of the judges really messed up BIG time.
-
-
It wasn't a robbery by any means. It was a very close fight that I had Martinez edging. I can't complain though. The 119-110 score was ridiculous though.Comment
-
Ok I agree if they give it to williams. But scoring a that fight to 119-110 is really crazy.
Damn at least it was closer than that..Comment
-
I ahd Paul up by 1 round..................Comment
-
I wanna see a rematch, that was a badass fight
Comment
-
People don't seem to get it. t doesn't matter that it was close. That judge gave only ONE round to Martinez. ONE ROUND.
In my opinion, I can't say anything other than that guy was paid off. And I don't like to throw that **** around. But he was paid off.
That means that even if he should have or shouldn't have won, he was at a disadvantage if he WAS, which I think he was, paid off.
THAT.. makes it a robbery.Comment
-
No it wasn't, Martinez would have knocked Willams down 4 times and he would have still lost.Comment
-
It's being called a robbery because a 119-110 scorecard in a fight like that is clearly a judge that is influenced in some way. This s*** has happened all year in every somewhat important fight, and it is sickening. If Paul Williams had won a close majority decision, no one would say anything. But because of this judge, this fight is looked at from a bad angle, and you know what? It should be. No more just excusing bad judging like this, I don't believe it even is bad judging, it is judges robbing someone.Comment
-
Same **** that happened in Malignaggi fight, stop trying to defend that scorecard because you thoguht the right man won.Comment
-
119-110 is a robbery, the winner isn't a robbery.
I had Williams by paper thin decision.
I wouldn't have a problem either way 115-113.Comment
Comment