Who Should Make the 2nd Ring Entrance? Manny Or Floyd??
Collapse
-
-
Floyd and Floyd Fans can't accept an asian person P4P#1. It's text
book racism if you ask me.
It's always look good first, win second, rather than win first then look good second.Comment
-
Floyd Mayweather is the challenger. Manny Pacquiao is the champion. Floyd Mayweather is considered by most the #2 p4p champion. Manny Pacquiao is considered #1 p4p. Manny Pacquiao is the betting favorite. I don't see anything that would justify Floyd coming in second aside from ego. Manny Pacquiao was the heavy draw, favorite, p4p champ, and still came in before Miguel Cotto because Miguel was the ww champ.Last edited by Rabbit ♠; 12-05-2009, 10:04 AM.Comment
-
Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Being in more divisions has no bearing on P4P status. Sure, it helps, but the idea of P4P is that weight is disregarded, is it not? Look it up, if you're not sure. There's bound to be a Wikipedia entry or some ****.Floyd has won belts in more weight divisons,
Calzaghe is a joke anyway,
Afraid to fight outside his own country and all........
Manny lost to an old erik morales,
He dont deserve to be P4P #1,
People arent gettin me here,
I dont dislike Manny,
I think he is a great fighter and extremely entertaining and I admire him for his charity work and ****,
But realistically Floyd is #1
To clarify: P4P = a way of ranking a fighter regardless of weight.
OK?
"Calzaghe is a joke": Your opinion is unimportant. Study the context in which Joe Calzaghe was used as an example of a way to question your logic. I could have used Chavez Jr. And as for Joe Calzaghe not fighting outside his country... shall we get technical? He fought outside his country more than he fought in it. If by "his country" you mean the United Kingdom, you are correct, but to use it within an argument for the sake of comparing Calzaghe to Mayweather is weak. Why? Because Mayweather has never fought outside his own country.
Can I be frank with you? I think your post is really ****ing ******, seems to completely lack any kind of rationality an makes me question your knowledge.
I ask you two questions:
Who is the consensus P4P greatest fighter of all time?
And how many losses does he have?
Think about that, then get back to us with a reply on how fighters with losses (even close ones, such as Morales-Pacquiao 1), cannot be considered P4P #1.
100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3Comment
Comment