Any chance we'd see Pacquiao/Mayweather II?

**Fulcrum29** · 12-05-2009, 12:58 AM

Originally posted by fatherpain

Provided this turns out to be a great fight, do you guys see any possibility for a rematch? Or do you think if he wins/loses, Pacman retires if he's elected to office...or if Floyd wins a close decision he avoids giving Pacman another shot at him? Or will the money be too great for either man to pass up?

I remember a week or two ago there was a lot of talk how Pac's team wanted stipulations for a rematch in the contract but Floyd's team was adamant about stipulations that there would be NO rematch. I don't know what they ended up settling on but it indicates that Floyd is confident of a win and wants NO rematch whereas Roach/Pac are hedging their bets and aren't as confident as one would think.

**..WaRSpencE..** · 12-05-2009, 12:58 AM

If Floyd wins..No

If Floyd Loses..Possibly

**aristotlemoses** · 12-05-2009, 12:59 AM

It would have to be a really close great fight. But yea if it's like one of the greats, then obviously there be so much money in a rematch either man would be ****** not to take it. But if it's a blow out, especially if Mayweather wins there no chance and as well there shouldn't be. But I am hoping for a great fight...and great for both sides not just a one sided fight. We need one of these mega fight to just be amazing. And I think this fight will be.

**DLT** · 12-05-2009, 01:01 AM

Originally posted by .::EyEKoNiK::.

If Floyd wins..No

If Floyd Loses..Possibly

Most think its the exact opposite. They say that Floyd only cares about money so why wouldnt he want to fight the guy he's going to make the most against, e****ally when he has already beat him? Alot of people think if he loses then Pac will want to walk with that victory instead of giving him a rematch

**fatherpain** · 12-05-2009, 01:03 AM

You'd think if Floyd was that confident against Pacman, he'd have no problem with a rematch clause as he could clean up twice.

Team Pacquiao might want a rematch clause in case it took them a defeat by decision to figure out Mayweather how to beat him in a 2nd fight?

**Fulcrum29** · 12-05-2009, 01:05 AM

Originally posted by fatherpain

You'd think if Floyd was that confident against Pacman, he'd have no problem with a rematch clause as he could clean up twice.

Team Pacquiao might want a rematch clause in case it took them a defeat by decision to figure out Mayweather how to beat him in a 2nd fight?

That's ******ed logic, if you're confident then you DON'T rematch someone. Why would you rematch someone you destroyed?

**DLT** · 12-05-2009, 01:06 AM

Originally posted by fatherpain

You'd think if Floyd was that confident against Pacman, he'd have no problem with a rematch clause as he could clean up twice.

Team Pacquiao might want a rematch clause in case it took them a defeat by decision to figure out Mayweather how to beat him in a 2nd fight?

What is the real story behind rematch clauses though? Floyd always thinks about money so Im thinking that Floyd dont want the clause because its probably already a set price in the clause for the winner when if they dont have one then Floyd would still give him a rematch but probably wants alot more money than Pac. Floyd would probably say that he only deserves 65/35

**PinoyZoi** · 12-05-2009, 01:06 AM

Unless its a draw, or a very close split decision.

Its a big paycheck

**fatherpain** · 12-05-2009, 01:18 AM

if you're confident then you DON'T rematch someone. Why would you rematch someone you destroyed?

If Mayweather wins, I doubt it will be a destruction. I could see him winning a decision though. If Team Mayweather was 100% confident Pacman couldnt beat them, wouldnt they entertain the thought of a rematch if there were big dollars involved again?

Any chance we'd see Pacquiao/Mayweather II?