Vs Hatton, Floyd only landed 129 in 10 rounds; Manny landed 73 in two!

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • -MAKAVELLI-
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Aug 2008
    • 50080
    • 3,580
    • 2,792
    • 169,000

    #41
    Originally posted by Easy Work
    Was the Hatton that fought Mayweather the same Hatton that fought Pac 2 years after?



    absolutely not...the Hatton that floyd fought was the pathetic 147 version...the Hatton that PAC fought was unbeaten and the lineal champ at 140

    Comment

    • Cash Cow
      Banned
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Nov 2009
      • 7662
      • 342
      • 396
      • 8,143

      #42
      Originally posted by jrosales13
      And, that was a year before fighting Floyd. So Mak was right about a year layoff.
      So Steve Forbes fought Oscar out of a year lay off and lost..

      Comment

      • Cash Cow
        Banned
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Nov 2009
        • 7662
        • 342
        • 396
        • 8,143

        #43
        Originally posted by Makavelli
        absolutely not...the Hatton that floyd fought was the pathetic 147 version...the Hatton that PAC fought was unbeaten and the lineal champ at 140
        LMAO@ "unbeaten and the lineal champ at 140"...

        so although he was already knocked out by Mayweather when he was UNBEATEN, 2 years prior to fighting Pacquiao....Manny's win is better?

        So Hatton who has spent his ENTIRE career weighing in between 140-147lbs was able to move up and weigh 147 lbs and beat Collazo for a title...but he wasn't good enough to weigh 145lbs and beat mayweather?.....

        Comment

        • jrosales13
          undisputed champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Sep 2008
          • 32632
          • 738
          • 763
          • 40,023

          #44
          Originally posted by Easy Work
          So Steve Forbes fought Oscar out of a year lay off and lost..
          So you saying Forbes is better than Floyd? Really now... You really going out of the limb with that one bro.

          Comment

          • -Antonio-
            -Antonio-
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jun 2005
            • 24259
            • 629
            • 164
            • 38,153

            #45
            None of that **** matters, B.

            Comment

            • Cash Cow
              Banned
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Nov 2009
              • 7662
              • 342
              • 396
              • 8,143

              #46
              Originally posted by jrosales13
              So you saying Forbes is better than Floyd? Really now... You really going out of the limb with the one bro.
              No im saying just cause Oscar was layed off a year doesnt mean he was unable to perform.....

              Comment

              • playaballer1
                SUPREME
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Mar 2008
                • 1233
                • 23
                • 28
                • 9,120

                #47
                Originally posted by boxer2k5
                who couldnt hit oscar the night he fought manny? pauli malanagi would have stoped him that night. and floyd and manny are 2 different styles. manny has to throw punches because he has no defense he has no plan b he has to punch and be effective to win.
                why dont yall post mayweather vs marquez numbers compared to vs manny?
                i mean marquez gave manny his toughest fight besides his other losts?

                why do manny fans always just post numbers in his favor instead of posting everything?
                nahh du....

                Comment

                • jrosales13
                  undisputed champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Sep 2008
                  • 32632
                  • 738
                  • 763
                  • 40,023

                  #48
                  Originally posted by Easy Work
                  LMAO@ "unbeaten and the lineal champ at 140"...

                  so although he was already knocked out by Mayweather when he was UNBEATEN, 2 years prior to fighting Pacquiao....Manny's win is better?

                  So Hatton who has spent his ENTIRE career weighing in between 140-147lbs was able to move up and weigh 147 lbs and beat Collazo for a title...but he wasn't good enough to weigh 145lbs and beat mayweather?.....
                  I had a Collazo beating Hatton... But, it was close.

                  Comment

                  • -MAKAVELLI-
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Aug 2008
                    • 50080
                    • 3,580
                    • 2,792
                    • 169,000

                    #49
                    Originally posted by Easy Work
                    LMAO@ "unbeaten and the lineal champ at 140"...

                    so although he was already knocked out by Mayweather when he was UNBEATEN, 2 years prior to fighting Pacquiao....Manny's win is better?

                    So Hatton who has spent his ENTIRE career weighing in between 140-147lbs was able to move up and weigh 147 lbs and beat Collazo for a title...but he wasn't good enough to weigh 145lbs and beat mayweather?.....


                    how many losses did Hatton have at 140? who was the lineal champ at jr welter before manny?


                    you wanna answer those questions?



                    and listen, this thread is about offense anyway...not your boy's forte so i dont know what you're tryin to argue...if you wanna make a respectable counter for it, crunch some numbers and breakdown how many times PAC gets hit as opposed to Floyd


                    f'n noobs...gotta teach em how to not look like dumbasses in discussions

                    Comment

                    • jrosales13
                      undisputed champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Sep 2008
                      • 32632
                      • 738
                      • 763
                      • 40,023

                      #50
                      Originally posted by Easy Work
                      No im saying just cause Oscar was layed off a year doesnt mean he was unable to perform.....
                      I don't know bro... He was not looking like the Golden boy after the Forbes fight. Maybe if he was fighting a legit WW or JMW who knows if he would of been able to perform.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP