Hopkins SHould Not Fight Dawson!!

**pistol whip** · 12-02-2009, 06:36 PM

I actually think it would be great if he did fight Dawson.

**ИATAS** · 12-02-2009, 06:39 PM

Dawson - hopkins would be very boring and wouldn't sell many tickets and would do poorly in TV.

Hopkins Adamek would sell well, that's legacy.

Hopkins vs David Haye in London would sell well, that's legacy.

Those are my two votes. If not, sure, fight Dawson.

**Freddy Krueger** · 12-02-2009, 06:40 PM

Originally posted by Sumakwel

Hopkins is 45 years old and may retire soon..

I know Dawson has a great chance of beating B-Hop but if B-Hop destroys Dawson just like what he did to Pavlik will just destroy and ruin the sport and destroying the Future!

Dawson must meet his maker sooner or later.

**Sicario** · 12-02-2009, 06:43 PM

Hopkins vs Haye or Adamek would be much better than Dawson

**Del Coqui** · 12-02-2009, 06:45 PM

I wanna see him vs Bute.

**Marcov** · 12-02-2009, 06:59 PM

I think he should or retire. He's done enough but if he stays, he should test the next generation

**z0jo** · 12-02-2009, 07:06 PM

Hopkins-Dawson is one of the biggest fights that can be made, a fight in which hopkins can dramatically increase his legacy with. Dawson is a young, hungry fighter who's favored to win, this fight would be huge and if he does beat him it would seal his legacy as one of the greats.

**KILLA RIGHT** · 12-02-2009, 07:15 PM

Don't compare kelly to dawson. Chad is a terrific boxer and has all the tools. Kelly just has jab jab right jab jab right...Dawson destroys b hop

**jrosales13** · 12-02-2009, 07:17 PM

Hopkins-Dawson at LHW, Hopkins-Adamek at CW, Hapkins-Haye at HW. I want to see next.

Hopkins SHould Not Fight Dawson!!