Tweet
Well I got into boxing about a year or two ago and know the rules fairly well, but how come in big fights you sometimes see judges with just absolutely rediculous score cards? I've watched two real good close fights recently on repeat (Cotto vs Clottey and JMM vs Pac 1st fight) and I scored them as unbiased as possible. I even turned off the audio so I wouldnt hear any commentary that could possibly lead me to changing my score.
When I scored the fight for Clottey and Cotto I had it 115-113 for Cotto and when I scored the Pac vs JMM fight I had it 114-111 for Pacquiao, but one judge from both of those fights just had absurd score cards. If I remember correctly, one judge from the Cotto/Clottey fight had it 117-110 for Cotto, and one judge had the JMM/PAC fight 115-110 for JMM. These fights were close, but im sure my scores were pretty accurate, right? How the hell could an official boxing judge have scores like that? It baffles me
When I scored the fight for Clottey and Cotto I had it 115-113 for Cotto and when I scored the Pac vs JMM fight I had it 114-111 for Pacquiao, but one judge from both of those fights just had absurd score cards. If I remember correctly, one judge from the Cotto/Clottey fight had it 117-110 for Cotto, and one judge had the JMM/PAC fight 115-110 for JMM. These fights were close, but im sure my scores were pretty accurate, right? How the hell could an official boxing judge have scores like that? It baffles me