If Foreman v Pac happens: Pac is a cherry picking bum.

**aether** · 11-30-2009, 11:44 AM

Originally posted by Shattered Jaw

There is absolutely no reason for this fight.

None at all. The only reason it is even being considered is that Arum and Roach are looking to carry the Pac momentum with an easy UD over the tough, but ultimately inexperienced and limited newly crowned paper belt holder Foreman.

This is TRUE CHERRYPICKING. I can't even believe this fight is being considered.

I mean who are they kidding? Sure, beating Cotto at 145 is a great win but you can't just avoid everyone and claim greatness. If you are going to fight at 154 where is Williams, where is Clottey, where is Mosely, where is Martinez? The very idea of cherry picking Foreman and clearly DUCKING Martinez and Williams in the 154 division is a joke. An absolutely sickening joke.

I hate to say it but:

Pac = Mayweather. Face it.

pac wants to run for a congressional seat. the elections are in may. they're gonna fight, if not in march, probably late 2010.

**Shattered Jaw** · 11-30-2009, 11:45 AM

I don't care about fighting Mayweather. Why cherry pick the weakest guy in 154 and duck the far better champs?

**Savino** · 11-30-2009, 11:45 AM

Is this fight under consideration? I thought it was just a fight people were joking about on here.

**Texanballer** · 11-30-2009, 11:46 AM

He deserves at least one cherry picking fight after beating Morales, Marquez, Barrera, Hatton, DLH, Cotto, etc.

**civicvx** · 11-30-2009, 11:47 AM

Beating Foreman for his 8th division champ is better on paper than beating Gayweater.

**Shattered Jaw** · 11-30-2009, 11:47 AM

Originally posted by Savino

Is this fight under consideration? I thought it was just a fight people were joking about on here.

It's clearly under consideration.

Pac/Diaz. Pac/Cotto. Pac/Foreman.

All picked from the basket of Arum.

**S H O B O X** · 11-30-2009, 11:47 AM

Originally posted by Shattered Jaw

I don't care about fighting Mayweather. Why cherry pick the weakest guy in 154 and duck the far better champs?

exactly , pac could easily win a title at 154 against foreman but what would the significance of it be? If floyd was considering to do the same he'd be crucified.

**IMDAZED** · 11-30-2009, 11:48 AM

He deserves a bout off - and that's what Foreman would be. I just don't want to hear anything about 8 division champ when even the 7 division thing is crock. If the IBO is real, I guess Roy Jones really picks up another legit title if he beats Danny Green on Wednesday.

**Ravishing** · 11-30-2009, 11:48 AM

Originally posted by Shattered Jaw

There is absolutely no reason for this fight.

None at all. The only reason it is even being considered is that Arum and Roach are looking to carry the Pac momentum with an easy UD over the tough, but ultimately inexperienced and limited newly crowned paper belt holder Foreman.

This is TRUE CHERRYPICKING. I can't even believe this fight is being considered.

I mean who are they kidding? Sure, beating Cotto at 145 is a great win but you can't just avoid everyone and claim greatness. If you are going to fight at 154 where is Williams, where is Clottey, where is Mosely, where is Martinez? The very idea of cherry picking Foreman and clearly DUCKING Martinez and Williams in the 154 division is a joke. An absolutely sickening joke.

I hate to say it but:

Pac = Mayweather. Face it.

Hmmmmm...I think you're exaggerating just a bit.

Pac just beat the #1-2 Welterweight in the world. I wouldn't really call that cherry picking if there was an inevitable fight with Mayweather looming.

My thing is, why can't Floyd fight in March when he's had 2 more months off than what Pacquiao would have up to that point when they would fight?

I think it's both teams trying to find a common ground, neither is ducking or dodging the fight.

If Foreman v Pac happens: Pac is a cherry picking bum.