He is the same guy enjoys throwing around the word "credibility", which is defined as the ability to convey unbiased views irrespective of preference, he clearly has a preference for Mayweather and beyond his own fan loyalty is unable to accept any criticism of Mayweather as a result, hence no credibility.
Comments Thread For: Mayweather vs Pacquiao Negotiations Hit a Snag
Collapse
-
-
He is the same guy enjoys throwing around the word "credibility", which is defined as the ability to convey unbiased views irrespective of preference, he clearly has a preference for Mayweather and beyond his own fan loyalty is unable to accept any criticism of Mayweather as a result, hence no credibility.
You are the one who cant accept anything positive about him.
Show me where I am not fair to Manny in this discussion. Do I go out of my way to call him names or degrade him?
Despite what you say youre still the one with the red reputation.Comment
-
-
yay me I didnt take a cheap shot and say after May beat Pac he can fight SSM..oops i jus did it lmao oh wellComment
-
He is the same guy enjoys throwing around the word "credibility", which is defined as the ability to convey unbiased views irrespective of preference, he clearly has a preference for Mayweather and beyond his own fan loyalty is unable to accept any criticism of Mayweather as a result, hence no credibility.
Here is wikipedias definition of credibility-
Traditionally, credibility has two key components: trustworthiness and expertise, which both have objective and subjective components. Trustworthiness is a based more on subjective factors, but can include objective measurements such as established reliability. Expertise can be similarly subjectively perceived, but also includes relatively objective characteristics of the source or message (e.g., credentials, certification or information quality). Secondary components of credibility include source dynamism (charisma) and physical attractiveness.
Im guessing you are in the red because no on trusts or agrees with your opinions and the fact that you have no expertise.Comment
-
-
Why not fight Mayweather on March 13th? Also where is this Floyd-Matt Hatton coming from? It would probably be a fight to just get another KO on record....what would be the point? where is this speculation coming from? I would think if Floyd was fighting a tune-up he'd fight a southpaw.
Can't see Manny fighting a tune-up because he's been active and a Foreman fight would be making a mockery of these divisional belts. I don't like the idea of just jumping weight classes and carefully picking a champ then moving to the next one. Pacquiao said 147 would be his last weight class so unless he's expecting Forman to meet at a catchweight of 148 or somethin then this is pointless also, but in boxing fighters will do ****** things for money and if I was Foreman I'd probably take the payday too.Comment
Comment