Roach said all that, the more reason not to buy into it. Roach always has a backup excuse incase Pacquiao loses. Pacquiao did not fight like a drained fighter against Marquez.
He he he. Freddie is right bro, PAC's a throwback fighter. Weight divisions especially the juniors and supers don't apply to him. Did you know that when PAC was in the lower weight classes, he literally have to skipped two weight divisions 115 and 118, as he overly outgrown being a flyweight and move directly to superbantamweight. I mean that's unheard of in recent years.
36 year old pac would be a beast at heavyweight...
Roach said all that, the more reason not to buy into it. Roach always has a backup excuse incase Pacquiao loses. Pacquiao did not fight like a drained fighter against Marquez.
Yeah, maybe he wasn't drained to the point that he was completely ineffectual, but he wasn't 100%.
Thats good info so we know Pac was drained. Here is the problem i have with some people here they dont want to accept that Team Pac have also drained his opponents in Delahoya and Cotto just saying. So it was brave of him to stay at 130 at the time and now it was also brave for him to fight weight drained guys. BS posters seem to have selective memory. We can go back and say surely Pac was drained in those pictures yet we have current fights where he defeat good WW but at lower weight.Before some go on attack mode chill. I wrote earlier that i think Pacman would have put up the same performance attic. 147 with Cotto. All this catchweight bull**** is pathetic. Pac is warrior no doubt i just wish those victories came free of the weight-draining we can see even Pac suffered at 130. To some that was bravery but what do you call it when now Pacman is the one fighting drained opponents.
Thats good info so we know Pac was drained. Here is the problem i have with some people here they dont want to accept that Team Pac have also drained his opponents in Delahoya and Cotto just saying. So it was brave of him to stay at 130 at the time and now it was also brave for him to fight weight drained guys. BS posters seem to have selective memory. We can go back and say surely Pac was drained in those pictures yet we have current fights where he defeat good WW but at lower weight.Before some go on attack mode chill. I wrote earlier that i think Pacman would have put up the same performance attic. 147 with Cotto. All this catchweight bull**** is pathetic. Pac is warrior no doubt i just wish those victories came free of the weight-draining we can see even Pac suffered at 130. To some that was bravery but what do you call it when now Pacman is the one fighting drained opponents.
Who the **** doesn't cut weight? Show Marquez some respect people. If Pacquiao was drained why was he faster then, and have just as much stamina. Weight drained but he could fight at that pace for 12 rounds?
this has to be addressed as well...just by looking at their mid sections (the PAC/MAB 2 and PAC/JMM 2) MAB and JMM are actually soft or even showing some fat but when you look at PAC he has no mid-section at all lol...it was also clear that JMM maxed out or was already pushing himself at 130 lbs...but you also gotta give credit to PAC for fighting them at a weight close the their ideal weight
again i didn't realize how bad he looked until today...it looked like his skin was peeled off to the point that we could clearly see his muscle fibers
as for the Cotto fight...i believe that it didn't matter if the fight was at 145 or 147 but it will still serve as a STAIN in PAC's victory against Cotto whether the PACFANS/TARDS like it or not
Comment