I challenege PULLCOUNTER to a boxing debate ONE on ONE.

[No Ceiling]

left hook is owning spray.....

[Spray_resistant]

bias can be contained Spray...it can be contained by those with the mental capacity to do so...and if one has both logic and a hint of bias, in some cases, it assists that individual in also learning the other side...learning the weaknesses of your own stance

bias is passion but it can be contained and used a positive tool


but that's just my 2cents


Tua vs Spray...ding ding

I suppose it can by some better than others though. Complete human objectivity is impossible as humans are irrational beings. How logical is boxing as an athletic competition in the first place for example? or all of things ppl find enjoyable? When you think about it, its no surprise that ppl have a hard time staying objective when discussing such a passion filled activity like boxing. Its a honed skill that not many are good at......I have to go to work now and wish I picked a different time to have posted in this thread

[Syf]

the problem with being completely neutral, is of course, one rarely takes a stand

[Xplosivo]

bias can be contained Spray...it can be contained by those with the mental capacity to do so...and if one has both logic and a hint of bias, in some cases, it assists that individual in also learning the other side...learning the weaknesses of your own stance

bias is passion but it can be contained and used a positive tool


but that's just my 2cents


Tua vs Spray...ding ding

like how biased you can get when it comes to the subject of pacquiao...

as for this thread..its a **** thread made by a mayweather nuthugger who wants to debate against a pacquiao nuthugger, so obviously most people will support the pacquiao nuthugger since majority of the posters here are pacquiao fans/mayweather haters but burner is one of them dumbf.ucks like horus who cant debate for **** yet does the calling out. pullcounter used to be a credible poster until he had pacmans balls over his mouth, now he is just plain biased towards ping ping AKA nuthin pelsonar/ i thont know the colol ov steloidz

[Xplosivo]

I suppose it can by some better than others though. Complete human objectivity is impossible as humans are irrational beings. How logical is boxing as an athletic competition in the first place for example? or all of things ppl find enjoyable? When you think about it, its no surprise that ppl have a hard time staying objective when discussing such a passion filled activity like boxing. Its a honed skill that not many are good at......I have to go to work now and wish I picked a different time to have posted in this thread

You are one of the few neutral posters here.

Others that should be mentioned for their neutral views: ..Calderownz..., starjammer, Left2body, K-Nan, ree****yaless (as long as it aint about roy), -Antonio-, salvador..etc

[Puntoyhauf]

like how biased you can get when it comes to the subject of pacquiao...

as for this thread..its a **** thread made by a mayweather nuthugger who wants to debate against a pacquiao nuthugger, so obviously most people will support the pacquiao nuthugger since majority of the posters here are pacquiao fans/mayweather haters but burner is one of them dumbf.ucks like horus who cant debate for **** yet does the calling out. pullcounter used to be a credible poster until he had pacmans balls over his mouth, now he is just plain biased towards ping ping AKA nuthin pelsonar/ i thont know the colol ov steloidz

Pullcounter, is not a Pacquiao nuthugger. he's one of the most unbiased posters I've seen here in NSB.

So he likes Manny. Now he's a nuthugger?

[-MAKAVELLI-]

I suppose it can by some better than others though. Complete human objectivity is impossible as humans are irrational beings. How logical is boxing as an athletic competition in the first place for example? or all of things ppl find enjoyable? When you think about it, its no surprise that ppl have a hard time staying objective when discussing such a passion filled activity like boxing. Its a honed skill that not many are good at......I have to go to work now and wish I picked a different time to have posted in this thread

i respect your views spray and we can further discuss this topic at a better time...i also have to get ready to watch the lakers beat the **** out of the warriors...peace

like how biased you can get when it comes to the subject of pacquiao...

as for this thread..its a **** thread made by a mayweather nuthugger who wants to debate against a pacquiao nuthugger, so obviously most people will support the pacquiao nuthugger since majority of the posters here are pacquiao fans/mayweather haters but burner is one of them dumbf.ucks like horus who cant debate for **** yet does the calling out. pullcounter used to be a credible poster until he had pacmans balls over his mouth, now he is just plain biased towards ping ping AKA nuthin pelsonar/ i thont know the colol ov steloidz

here's a disclosure about my posting style Xplosivo, i only reciprocate what other posters throw out there...

if a poster comes in with well thought out views and does it in a respectful, positive manner, then i address that person with that same approach

if a poster comes in as a troll, as you have in the past, then i address you as a troll...its that simple...im not wasting any effort on people that wouldn't understand anyway


when it comes to being subjective, i can be...i dont think i could be with you since i already know that you're 1) a ***** for putting me on ignore and 2) have the mental fortitude of a chia pet

[Syf]

btw this is a slick boxer that hasn't fought for about a year, against a boxer with great reach for his weight and good work rate. He's like a lil Pdub without as much pop in his punches.

I have Funeka to win this fight, UD

He impressed me a bit against Campbell in their fight

[Puntoyhauf]

Got to give Spray props though...

but his usertitle makes me think "BS Paper Neutrality Champ"

do you really have to put it there instead of someone else witnessing to that?

[4773Y350NM3]

In a debate, generally it really matters on the topic. Being a good debater also does include being biased on certain subject. If your not, basically you giving in to the other person's view point, and that means you lose on that debate. But if the facts is so overwhelming, you just have to accept defeat. It doesnt mean you was wrong, it just means the other person gave a much better argument.