Tweet
OK, I will.
So, these two "ATG's": One makes the completely wrong pick and loses his money, and the other who says all kinds of **** about Pacquiao, including "he's one-dimensional" when we all know for a fact that Floyd was a huge Pacquiao fan before Manny came up to his weight class, right?
I should take their word for it? Why? My own track record in bets is probably better, yet I'm a mere boxing fan. I don't believe Cotto is shot, but I do think he fights more cautiously now. So while they might be ATG's and have all this great knowledge, this proves two things: they can be wrong, and one of them is a straight-up liar.
As for Roach, nobody knows when he's being serious, and nobody knows when he's saying **** to get into the opponents' head. First round KO for Cotto over Pacquiao? Clearly, the game plan was to fool Cotto and let him feel he could carry on doing what he was doing and keep on having success with it. Yeah, OK, I'll take Roach's word for it too, shall I?
Teddy Atlas: The guy who gets just about everything wrong? I should take his word for it?
And who are you? Double M = Money Mayweather? If so, I guess you have no reason to discredit Pacquiao at all, right, and what you're saying is all completely true? You downplay Pacquiao's wins and try to make your favorite fighter look better.
Tell you what... Why don't I just use my own judgment instead of acting like a sucker and listening to what other people tell me, no matter who they are and what they have done. I go with what I feel, and most of the time, it turns out to be right. So, I will continue to use my own eyes, my own judgment, and avoid being a sucker who follows the crowd.
* Adopts moron voice *
"Durrrr... well, Roy said it, so it must be true. Durrr..." and "Floyd said it, so I know he's telling the truth. Durrrrr!"
So, these two "ATG's": One makes the completely wrong pick and loses his money, and the other who says all kinds of **** about Pacquiao, including "he's one-dimensional" when we all know for a fact that Floyd was a huge Pacquiao fan before Manny came up to his weight class, right?
I should take their word for it? Why? My own track record in bets is probably better, yet I'm a mere boxing fan. I don't believe Cotto is shot, but I do think he fights more cautiously now. So while they might be ATG's and have all this great knowledge, this proves two things: they can be wrong, and one of them is a straight-up liar.
As for Roach, nobody knows when he's being serious, and nobody knows when he's saying **** to get into the opponents' head. First round KO for Cotto over Pacquiao? Clearly, the game plan was to fool Cotto and let him feel he could carry on doing what he was doing and keep on having success with it. Yeah, OK, I'll take Roach's word for it too, shall I?
Teddy Atlas: The guy who gets just about everything wrong? I should take his word for it?
And who are you? Double M = Money Mayweather? If so, I guess you have no reason to discredit Pacquiao at all, right, and what you're saying is all completely true? You downplay Pacquiao's wins and try to make your favorite fighter look better.
Tell you what... Why don't I just use my own judgment instead of acting like a sucker and listening to what other people tell me, no matter who they are and what they have done. I go with what I feel, and most of the time, it turns out to be right. So, I will continue to use my own eyes, my own judgment, and avoid being a sucker who follows the crowd.
* Adopts moron voice *
"Durrrr... well, Roy said it, so it must be true. Durrr..." and "Floyd said it, so I know he's telling the truth. Durrrrr!"
Nice ownage !!
Comment