a question for yopu joe calzaghe haters

[slimshandy69]

BTW im a calzaghe hater...but i see both sides of the arguement so answer this..

Calzaghe beat a prime lacey(all you on here predcited lacey would win dont lie), a prime kessler, roy jones and hopkins(close fight)..

Now if calzaghe can be past his prime at the age of 35 and beat two young fighters such a lacey and kessler then surely that shows how good he is..

Also with the roy jones and hopkins wins yes they were past it...but surely joe was past it as well. Wasnt joe 37 years old???

I mean eubank was past it when he thought joe at the age of 30, which nowadays is young for boxers..so surely hopkinsd and roy jones were fair gamne considereing calzaghe was well past it..plus went to a weight class they were more use to fighting at..

just some thought for yall to ponder from a calzaghe hater...

[slimshandy69]

obviously this question could not be answered...

[Doorag]

what's the question?

[jrosales13]

obviously this question could not be answered...

You didn't give a question. You gave an opinion...

[The_Demon]

shut up fool

[slimshandy69]

You didn't give a question. You gave an opinion...

well do you agree with my opinion...my question is when was calzaghes prime...

All his big wins were when he was pout of his prime...but the haters dont mention that..

People pikc and choose peoples primes..even when calzaghe was 36 he was still in his prime..yet jones and hopkins were out of there primes..


Calzaghe beat UNDEFEATED KESSLER WHEN he was 35...he beat lacey at 33...

So when was calzaghes prime...you casnt have it both ways...