Hopkings couldnt beat Joe calzaghe, beat a bunch of lil guys..overrated!!!!

[andres aza]

This dude got beat by taylor (TWICE), Joe Calzahge, that tells be he's not an ATG like you people make him out to be!! Jones beat him with one hand, Oscar was winning after the 8th. he just beat small guys...**** Hopkins!!!

[ИATAS]

You do realize hopkins was 40 years old against taylor and 42 years old against Calzaghe right?

He was an all time great before those fights you ******.

[Spray_resistant]

He has a solid resume until his move up to LHW and I will say that he clearly lost to Joe and don't see what anyone is debating about in that fight.

[andres aza]

You do realize hopkins was 40 years old against taylor and 42 years old against Calzaghe right?

He was an all time great before those fights you ******.

He was in his beast years when he fought taylor! Well at least thats what his fans say. Cause he couldnt have been when he fought Roy...right? haha

[ИATAS]

He has a solid resume until his move up to LHW and I will say that he clearly lost to Joe and don't see what anyone is debating about in that fight.

Why does it even matter if he did lose clearly? He was 42 years old who clearly slowed down and joe had an extremely high work rate. 40+ year olds will forever struggle with guys with tremendous work rates (which is why hopkins was the underdog going into the fight and the fight played out exactly as the "experts predicted" (that being it would be a close/competitive fight but the younger calzaghe would win on points do to a high work rate)).

[Mr. Philadel]

Hopkins....not Hopkings!!!....get it right!!!

[andres aza]

Why does it even matter if he did lose clearly? He was 42 years old who clearly slowed down and joe had an extremely high work rate. 40+ year olds will forever struggle with guys with tremendous work rates (which is why hopkins was the underdog going into the fight and the fight played out exactly as the "experts predicted" (that being it would be a close/competitive fight but the younger calzaghe would win on points do to a high work rate)).

HE lost to Joe ahhaha Period!!!

[ИATAS]

He was in his beast years when he fought taylor!

His beast years?

Well at least thats what his fans say.

No they don't. I've never heard anyone say Hopkins was in his prime at 40 years old. That's logically impossible.

Cause he couldnt have been when he fought Roy...right? haha

Huh? They fought what, 16 years ago? Both were green fighters. And so what if Roy beat hopkins, I thought Roy Jones was god on this website? Isn't roy jones "the greatest fighter of the 90's???" Well, wasn't that the 90's?

My god people, stop acting like a bunch of ******s, please.

[S A M U R A I]

Younger Hopkins was great to watch. His beating of Johnson, for example. Dude was on fire. He changed his style somewhat a few years ago and had a few stinkers, but so what. Look at the Pavlik fight, that was a great performance, especially considering his age. Give old 'Nard a break, he's been great for the sport and deserves respect.



100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

[ShatteredGlass]

His loss to Joie doesn't count, because he was old.

On Joes Resume it actually says

Hopkins - Old