John Fraiser interview on Pacquiao

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Imhotep
    Banned
    • Nov 2009
    • 2014
    • 115
    • 0
    • 2,194

    #11
    Originally posted by 2501
    so its only pertinent whenever its a criticism against Pacquiao, but when it's aimed towards Floyd, its "hate" right? Or better yet, "racism"?
    Its hate when you try to discredit him and hold him to a different standard then other fighters.Don`t act like you and your like is holier then thou and just giving Floyd "constructive criticism".All ya`ll do is bash him for everything he does while hold pacquiao on a pedestal for beating worn-out fighters.

    Comment

    • madsweeney
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jun 2009
      • 4551
      • 508
      • 298
      • 14,237

      #12
      The one part I didn't like is when he compared Pac to probably the greatest fighter for each of his classes. Sure pac may not beat the ATG in those classes but could definately hang with probably the top 5 ATGs in each of those weights and that says alot

      Comment

      • RSBonos
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Feb 2006
        • 2261
        • 43
        • 1
        • 15,607

        #13
        Originally posted by Imhotep
        How does telling the truth and not kissing a** culturally bias?Alot of nonblacks said cotto was washed up,Alot of nonblacks said delahoya was weight drained,alot of nonblacks said Hatton was ruined after his fight with Floyd.Heck Freddie raoch admitted to all of these things before Pac put him in their with those fighters.
        He gives Pac almost no credit for beating three guys that he was either an underdog or the fights were nearly 50-50 going in. He brings up his losses that came more then ten years ago, doesn't mention Pac's wins against other HOF's at lower weights and not to mention that his move up in weight is almost unprecedented in boxing history. Talks about paper titles but fails to mention the linear ones.

        There is no shame in having close fights with Marquez. Pac, Marquez, Barrera and Morales would all be very competitive against Sanchez and Arguello. Pac would not be some chump against Chavez, Duran, Pernell or prime ODLH either. Not saying he would win all those fights but he would be very competitive.

        The guy can claim all the Pinoy relatives that he likes, he still sounds like a hater.

        Comment

        • AssasinKing
          UNITED
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Mar 2009
          • 5968
          • 169
          • 116
          • 13,253

          #14
          Hes making all these excuses about the people pac won..."ppl say jmm won both"...or "cotto looked bad against clottey"
          He fails to mention pac drew and lost 1...should of won both if the judge scored the first round in fight number 1 correctly...and
          Also he forgot to mention cotto had a huge ass gash over his head against clottey...who he still beat!
          "mayweather showed hes the best by beating marquez, who didnt even win a round" - jmm won 1 round so shame lol, and again
          he fails to mention marquez jumped up 2 weight divisions to a class hes never been in, AND mayweather STILL doesnt even make the 145 agreed weight limit.... what a ****

          This guy chats so much crap, hes acting like hes giving pac credit..but all hes doing is making excuses...YES mayweather beating oscar at 154 was impressive...but again, its not as impressive as if he beat a mosley at 147..or a marg, or cotto before recent times....even if he faced clottey for god sake, just some1 worth fighting lol

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP