Cotto looked fine to me, and sharp as he's been too.
So Cotto was as sharp as his fights with Mosley? Cotto look great in those first couple of rounds but no way he was better or sharper than the version tha face Mosley or even the Margarito fight.
It's useless, you ******s are blinded by PAC CANNOT BE THAT GOOD wagon so his opponents must be on the down slide, old, ruined, or he MUST be on steroids. And that's according to a very reliable source, here is the link www.boxingscene.com/forums
I was told of a very good source in PRBoxingsBestPromotions, that Cotto's contract for the Pacquiao fight only allowed him to rehidrate to 154. You could see he was ripped but not as beefy like when he fought Mosley or his past fights, everybody knows that Cotto rehidrates to 160+, you could see his punches where not doing that much damage, bet if he would come in 160+ Pacquiao would have felt those punches alot more & probably go down at some point. At the end of the day is Cotto's fault for signing that contract.
I give props to Pacquiao for a great fight but all this catch weight crap has to stop, if he as good as Roach says he is then he should have fought Cotto at 147 & let him rehidrate however he pleased, to me this tarnishes Pac's wins, always getting the advantage before the bell rings.
I tried telling people this.
NO WAY was Cotto allowed to swell-up to 160 like he ALWAYS does.
157 is the lightest he's been in the ring..and that was against Chop chop.
So Cotto was as sharp as his fights with Mosley? Cotto look great in those first couple of rounds but no way he was better or sharper than the version tha face Mosley or even the Margarito fight.
Tweet
Comment