I'm not critisizing the opponent, its what he should be doing now. I'm just saying it speaks volumes that they need to seek guys like this out in order to find someone they're sure isn't going to knock him out again.
And look at the poor opposition Rahman, Golota, McCline fought etc.
Did any of them get brutally beaten by opponents as poor as Sanders and Brewster? No.
that makes it worse for them cause they have no excuse for fighting the guys they've been fighting.... who the the hell is wlad supposed to fight?? ruiz, toney, rahman are all in fights... byrd didnt want the fight... was he supposed to pound mccline and barrett again(they're already in fights too)... i understood your point about the TOS fight, but you're not making any sence now
No ****, you are the one talking **** about his opponent and then you can't name someone else because there is no one else.
How about you decide which Klitschko you're asking me about?
I've said 3 times that its GREAT that Wlad is fighting soft opponents right now, because that's what he needs.
As for Vitali, instead of fighting John Ruiz's leftovers and a guy that hasn't beat a top 15 ranked fighter in 4 years, he could have made and attempt to unify with Byrd or Ruiz.
Absolutly Rahman is a soft opponent for Klitschko.
Rahman already lost to Ruiz, and hasn't beaten a top 15 fighter in FOUR years.
i agree, but alot of people say otherwise... alot of people think rahman will either win or is a legit threat to VK.... go argue with dougie fisher at maxboxing, who think rahman will beat VK...
Anyone who thinks Rahman is a soft opponent for VK needs their head examined. Like I said before.
VK extends his left jab straight up, and measures the distance from his opponent. He follows the straight right directly behind this. Rahman will hookercut the left out of the way, and land flush right hands on his chin.
Just listen to what I am saying please. It will play out very similar. Though I am not saying he will beat him, I sure as hell am not going to count him out. That is absurd: and should be between 2 peices of bread made into a ludacris sandwich.
You're wasting my time. Keep up with the conversation or don't post.
Wlad isn't fighting Rahman. Vitali is.
Rahman is a weak fight for Vitali.
Wlad's next fight is also weak, but that's exactly what he needs. I never said that it was a bad move on his part.
i disgree that castillo is weak or soft... he's not a huge threat in the division so far, but he has beaten moorer and thats more than what peter has done and everyone is going nuts over him... at this point you could argue that castillo is top 10 behind: vk, byrd, toney, ruiz, rahman, brewster, barrett and golota
How about you decide which Klitschko you're asking me about?
I've said 3 times that its GREAT that Wlad is fighting soft opponents right now, because that's what he needs.
As for Vitali, instead of fighting John Ruiz's leftovers and a guy that hasn't beat a top 15 ranked fighter in 4 years, he could have made and attempt to unify with Byrd or Ruiz.
Does that answer your question?
wasn't the attempts to unify thwarted by King's demands on options to future VK fights??
Comment