Fact Erik Morales was not shot when he beat Pacquiao
I keep hearing this ****** **** being posted from time to time as a way to discredit Manny Pacquiao. Only and Idiot or someone new to boxing would make such an ignorant statement.
First, Erik Morales was only 28 years old, had a record of 47-2, and his only losses came to another hall of famer fighter. Not just that both losses could have easily been scored in favor of Morales, making him and undefeated fighter when pac faced him.
Second, people forget how skilled Erik Morales (a ****in beast) was in his prime. P4P he is one of the greatest boxer punchers and a helluva problem for any fighter in any era. Losing to Morales is actually not a bad thing and something you can't hold against a fighter. He is a legend and an all-time great.
I keep hearing this ****** **** being posted from time to time as a way to discredit Manny Pacquiao. Only and Idiot or someone new to boxing would make such an ignorant statement.
First, Erik Morales was only 28 years old, had a record of 47-2, and his only losses came to another hall of famer fighter. Not just that both losses could have easily been scored in favor of Morales, making him and undefeated fighter when pac faced him.
Second, people forget how skilled Erik Morales (a ****in beast) was in his prime. P4P he is one of the greatest boxer punchers and a helluva problem for any fighter in any era. Losing to Morales is actually not a bad thing and something you can't hold against a fighter. He is a legend and an all-time great.
Comment