Will boxing ever be rid of its inherent corruption?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • vercingetorix3
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 1581
    • 73
    • 152
    • 8,356

    #1

    Will boxing ever be rid of its inherent corruption?

    Let's be honest, there are robberies on both sides of the pond, some more blatant than others. And then people complain about the incorrect decisions made by judges or referees (Holyfield-Valuev, John-Juarez, Lewis-Holyfield I, Ottke-Reid, to name a few).

    But is the corruption an inherent part of the sport that we all love? I would submit that it is. Because of the nature of the sport, it's impossible to get rid of the corruption (selection of judges, referees, location, sanctioning bodies, etc.).

    But can we as the consumers of boxing really do anything about it? We may write an angry post or two in capital letters, occasionally bring it up to defend a point, demand a re-match, but time passes on and we just take it for what it is; we really are more or less powerless when it comes to holding people accountable.

    And in the interest of full disclosure, no, I'm not subtly bitching about the outcome of Kessler-Ward. I haven't watched it all yet to make a decision, but from the posts here, Ward beautifully outboxed the European fighter.
  • PhonzoXD
    Banned
    • Oct 2009
    • 268
    • 14
    • 16
    • 615

    #2
    prolly not

    Comment

    • DiegoFuego
      Ask my dad, I'm GAY!
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jan 2005
      • 17338
      • 1,403
      • 586
      • 24,657

      #3
      I don't know if boxing is corrupt so much as the judges are incompetent. I think judges react too much to what the crowd is doing. I can't think of any other reason Froch got the decision over Dirrell other than the crowd cheering every time Froch missed a punch. It was a one-sided fight in terms of rounds and any judge should have been able to handle that.

      I know fans' opinions mean little in the way of decisions, but I also think it's annoying that fans won't admit when their guy got beat. I can't believe people actually claim to have scored that fight for Froch. And I can't believe Scandinavians are actually claiming Kessler was victimized by biased officiating.

      I couldn't imagine myself arguing if my guy lost a clear decision, but fans will justify anything because they really think that one guy, be it Kessler or Froch, is their country that night.

      Maybe it's just because I'm from the U.S. and we have countless elite fighters at all times. It must be different when you come from someplace with just 2 or 3 good fighters.

      Comment

      • ИATAS
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jul 2007
        • 36648
        • 2,509
        • 1,953
        • 50,835

        #4
        Probably not and while there is still some corruption in boxing, lets not forget our history because there were periods of time when boxing was literally controlled by the Mafia. As bad as it seems at times now, it's nothing compared to what it once was.

        And there was nothing corrupt about kessler-ward. At best you can say you didn't like how the ref controlled the fight.

        Comment

        • MANGLER
          Sex Tape Flop Artist
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2008
          • 30142
          • 1,705
          • 2,355
          • 46,598

          #5
          No it won't.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP