Rule Change in Boxing? (Clinching)

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Konstantin
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jan 2005
    • 4478
    • 226
    • 903
    • 20,367

    #1

    Rule Change in Boxing? (Clinching)

    Should a rule be added for the amount of clinches one can initiate during a boxing match per round? A clinch is basically like a timeout, the action stops so the guys can get a breather/reset. Other sports have a limit to the amount of timeouts a team gets, so should boxing. lt also gives an excuse for fighters to not learn how to fight on the inside. lt would also make fights more crowd pleasing. Hopefully to the effect of Corrales Castllo 1.

    Many judges differ on their ideas about how often a fighter can clinch. All Jay Nady does is break the fighters up, I'm pretty sure action loving Smoger would deduct points after a certain amount of warnings.

    Isn't it a bit crazy that if there are different judges for the exact same fight the outcome cold be different? That under judge 1 fighter A would win but under judge 2 fighter B would win.
    Last edited by Konstantin; 11-22-2009, 07:29 PM.
  • Dambala
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jul 2008
    • 2934
    • 69
    • 101
    • 10,163

    #2
    Originally posted by Konstantin
    Should a rule be added for the amount of clinches one can initiate during a boxing match per round? A clinch is basically like a timeout, the action stops so the guys can get a breather/reset. Other sports have a limit to the amount of timeouts a team gets, so should boxing. lt also gives an excuse for fighters to not learn how to fight on the inside. lt would also make fights more crowd pleasing. Hopefully to the effect of Corrales Castllo 1.

    Many judges differ on their ideas about how often a fighter can clinch. All Jay Nady does is break the fighters up, I'm pretty sure action loving Smoger would deduct points after a certain amount of warnings.

    Isn't it a bit crazy that if there are different judges for the exact same fight the outcome cold be different?

    Good point, I don't know about a certain rule to specify the limit of clinches but I think the refs should be more strict about it thought.

    Comment

    • Bhopreign
      Banned
      • Jun 2006
      • 11273
      • 419
      • 100
      • 12,036

      #3
      Originally posted by Konstantin
      Should a rule be added for the amount of clinches one can initiate during a boxing match per round? A clinch is basically like a timeout, the action stops so the guys can get a breather/reset. Other sports have a limit to the amount of timeouts a team gets, so should boxing. lt also gives an excuse for fighters to not learn how to fight on the inside. lt would also make fights more crowd pleasing. Hopefully to the effect of Corrales Castllo 1.

      Many judges differ on their ideas about how often a fighter can clinch. All Jay Nady does is break the fighters up, I'm pretty sure action loving Smoger would deduct points after a certain amount of warnings.

      Isn't it a bit crazy that if there are different judges for the exact same fight the outcome cold be different? That under judge 1 fighter A would win but under judge 2 fighter B would win.
      If you dont want to be clinched then you wont be clinched.

      Comment

      • Glamour Puss
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Aug 2009
        • 12516
        • 456
        • 270
        • 15,684

        #4
        Good post.

        I always harken back to the Berto/Collazo fight. If that ref doesn't deduct a point and warn Berto seriously about excessive holding in the 2nd round, that fight is terrible.

        Its precisely because the ref got control of the match early that Berto was FORCED to fight.

        Comment

        • Glamour Puss
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Aug 2009
          • 12516
          • 456
          • 270
          • 15,684

          #5
          Originally posted by Bhopreign
          If you dont want to be clinched then you wont be clinched.
          Wrong. But I'd expect it from you, since you're an advocate of spoilers and cheaters.

          Comment

          • Allucard
            Undisputed Champion
            • Jun 2007
            • 5979
            • 393
            • 56
            • 12,399

            #6
            Originally posted by Bhopreign
            If you dont want to be clinched then you wont be clinched.
            That's true. Cotto never clinched.
            The kind of clinch Ward and Kessler did were consented by both men.

            Comment

            • Kobe Bryant
              lefhooktodabody
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Sep 2006
              • 5319
              • 165
              • 2
              • 14,366

              #7
              ..................................

              Comment

              • Pullcounter
                no guts no glory
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jan 2004
                • 42582
                • 549
                • 191
                • 49,739

                #8
                Originally posted by Konstantin
                Should a rule be added for the amount of clinches one can initiate during a boxing match per round? A clinch is basically like a timeout, the action stops so the guys can get a breather/reset. Other sports have a limit to the amount of timeouts a team gets, so should boxing. lt also gives an excuse for fighters to not learn how to fight on the inside. lt would also make fights more crowd pleasing. Hopefully to the effect of Corrales Castllo 1.

                Many judges differ on their ideas about how often a fighter can clinch. All Jay Nady does is break the fighters up, I'm pretty sure action loving Smoger would deduct points after a certain amount of warnings.

                Isn't it a bit crazy that if there are different judges for the exact same fight the outcome cold be different? That under judge 1 fighter A would win but under judge 2 fighter B would win.
                this isn't MMA and there shouldn't be so much clinching, but boxing orgs could enforce the rules and make refs break up clinches as soon as they happen.

                Comment

                • Pullcounter
                  no guts no glory
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jan 2004
                  • 42582
                  • 549
                  • 191
                  • 49,739

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Allucard
                  That's true. Cotto never clinched.
                  The kind of clinch Ward and Kessler did were consented by both men.
                  cotto did clinch, but that was because pac was ****ing up his faces w/ punches...

                  Comment

                  • Weebler I
                    El Weeblerito I
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Dec 2007
                    • 31092
                    • 1,459
                    • 1,648
                    • 54,550

                    #10
                    There's nothing wrong with clinching/leaning in. The problem is when you hold the other fighter with one arm to stop him punching and punch him with your other hand.
                    Last edited by Weebler I; 11-22-2009, 08:06 PM.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP