I've made it clear that I'm not a Mayweather fan. Without further delay, here are my questions.
If people say Floyd is a ducker, dodger, overrated, never fought a threat, then why would a fighter be rated so high for beating him?
The haters say he's not even a top 50 ATG, but then expect Pacquiao to be a top 10 ATG for beating him.
I would like for someone to explain this to me.
Just a fan of the sport in general trying to understand some of these senseless claims.
If people say Floyd is a ducker, dodger, overrated, never fought a threat, then why would a fighter be rated so high for beating him?
The haters say he's not even a top 50 ATG, but then expect Pacquiao to be a top 10 ATG for beating him.
I would like for someone to explain this to me.
Just a fan of the sport in general trying to understand some of these senseless claims.
Comment