overwieght in wieght-in is now called "pulling a mayweather"

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Benny Leonard
    Liberty
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Feb 2007
    • 7436
    • 303
    • 38
    • 14,471

    #21
    Originally posted by zeidrich
    good luck with that one ask the espn writers to use your idea ... but ive been noticing that pulling a mayweather has been used in some article even before the cotto-pac fight.
    I thought pulling a Mayweather was about talking trash, not coming through on your promise, and ducking and dodging???

    Comment

    • Piper the Great
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Sep 2007
      • 2325
      • 32
      • 73
      • 9,128

      #22
      Originally posted by Benny Leonard
      I thought pulling a Mayweather was about talking trash, not coming through on your promise, and ducking and dodging???
      lol mayweather gon have bout 10 different meanings when its all said & done. Sad part is everybody will know exactly what we talking bout.

      Comment

      • The Great Shark
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 3542
        • 295
        • 466
        • 4,021

        #23
        Originally posted by zeidrich


        check 1:02
        so we have a new term in boxing... "Pulling a mayweather" w/c means deliberately will not follow the weight limit.

        in 10 years, mayweather will be a legend and will not be forgotten because of this terms, cong**** floyd.

        "pulling a mayweather"
        floyding = ducking
        And draining fighters is called "pulling a Roach"........**** outta here.

        Comment

        • Benny Leonard
          Liberty
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Feb 2007
          • 7436
          • 303
          • 38
          • 14,471

          #24
          Originally posted by Piper the Great
          lol mayweather gon have bout 10 different meanings when its all said & done. Sad part is everybody will know exactly what we talking bout.
          It will be the new "Forget about it"

          Comment

          • ThePunchingBag
            Rolling with the punches.
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Apr 2009
            • 5766
            • 192
            • 55
            • 12,300

            #25
            Originally posted by TheGreatShark
            And draining fighters is called "pulling a Roach"........**** outta here.
            The difference is while Floyd has been pulling a mayweather for years, Roach only drained 1 fighter of 2 lbs, and that was Miguel Cotto. Now before you bring up DLH, Roach had nothing to with it. DLH chose to come in at 147 when they were signing the contract.

            Who else has Roach weight drained?

            Comment

            • PAKYO
              in the sandlands
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Oct 2009
              • 3805
              • 116
              • 73
              • 10,212

              #26
              Originally posted by Piper the Great
              lol mayweather gon have bout 10 different meanings when its all said & done. Sad part is everybody will know exactly what we talking bout.
              Definitely, by the time i have grandsons, they won't know that mayweather was a person's name, they would just thought it's a synonym for those words.

              That would be floyd's legacy. A fuc.kin shame to the sport called boxing.

              Comment

              • project xxx1
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jul 2009
                • 12868
                • 764
                • 1,289
                • 22,511

                #27
                Originally posted by Benny Leonard
                So pulling a Pac would be to....be "The Butcher": he'll take you after you're shot, aged, and is allowed to chop off pounds of flesh.





                I had to; that was to easy.
                well said and agreed

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP