Hello NSB I have a serious question

**popeyes** · 11-21-2009, 03:01 PM

Originally posted by Prince Vegeta

My question is, if so many people think that Pacquiao's accomplishments are superior to Mayweather's then why make threads about it trying to prove *****s wrong? If they are so wrong then just laugh at them and ignore them. From what I have seen in NSB, posters compare Pacquiao to Mayweather on a daily basis but their wording and opinions are something you would say when comparing Augustus to Ali, which that comparison would never happen because there is really no comparison in their accomplishments so whoever brings this topic up would be laughed at and ignored and probably banned. While Pacquiao-Mayweather threads end up with 200+ replies and some very good points made by both '*****s' and '*******s'.

Does anybody get what I am saying?

Just a question coming from a boxing fan, I won't side with anyone.

its going to be like this until both these guys retire

**Prince Vegeta** · 11-21-2009, 03:13 PM

I think their should be more respect for both.

*******s, Mr Boat Buyers ****suckers, *****s, nuthugger, Cottards etc these names indicate that discussions have nothing to do with friendly/heated debates/educated answers. This just shows that it's a bunch of rugrat-minded adults going back and forth with eachother, just saying their opinions on this matter and establishing that opinion as actual factual. Only some actually bring up numbers, and even when numbers are brought, some other poster comes out of left field to discredit those numbers. Wether it's from the *******s or *****s, I don't see any educated discussions. When someone brings up an educated debate, they will be called some name and then the thread just turns in to name-calling, who owns who, cat fights, etc.

With that said,

I like it. It's pretty entertaining if you ask me.

Hello NSB I have a serious question