pacquiao cherry picked his opponents

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Equinox
    Undisputed Champion
    • Mar 2009
    • 1319
    • 118
    • 22
    • 7,528

    #1

    pacquiao cherry picked his opponents

    i straight LAUGH MY ASS OFFFFF when i hear pac tards saying pac is so great because he fought the best while floyd did not. hard core mayweather fan here, but yea, he did take the easy sides some times, BUT PAC DID TOO! why did both fighters do this? because of $$$$<<

    pac fan, how are you going to sit there and tell me that pac fought the best in erik morales when raheem beat him right before? there were 4 champions in that weight at the time. why did pac fight morales? because of $$$

    pac fan, how are you going to sit there and tell me that pac fought the best when he faced barrera for the 2nd time after barrera was clearly past it and just lost to marquez? there were 4 champions in that division. why did pac fight barrera? because of $$$

    pac fan, how are you going to sit there and tell me that pac fought the best when he decided to fiace DAVID ****ING DIAZ the weakest link at light weight and novice bum?

    pac fan, how are you going to sit there and tell me that pac fought the best in de la hoya? a 36 year old fighter that was rated no where near welter weight rankings or p4p rankings? there was a rematch with marquez, or any of the other top jr WW's or WW's to choose from. why did pac fight de la hoya? because of $$$

    pac fan, how are you going to sit there and tell me that pac fought the best in ricky hatton? a fighter he had just witnessed almost getting knocked out by juan lazcano and looking good against a one handed fighter that even juan diaz is not scared to get hit by. there was 4 other champions at 140 that were better than him but didnt get rated higher than him because they didnt have as big of a name. why did pac choose hatton? because of $$$

    pac fan, how are you going to sit there and tell me that pac fought the best in miguel cotto? he had just witnessed front row miguel cotto getting a gift decision in new york against an inferior fighter.

    OPTION A: mosley(destroys the #1 welter weight in brutal fashion)
    OPTION B: cotto(barely gets by clottey while receiving punishment)
    pac, chooses option B.



    pac always chose the easier side when there were more challenging sides he could have chosen

    and so mayweather and pacquiao are not too different you see
  • CrackYourJaw
    The Boston Celtics
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2009
    • 4925
    • 188
    • 97
    • 13,670

    #2
    You really don't like the man do you?

    It's cool.

    To each his own. But it must ruin boxing for you, hating some one so much. Just relax and enjoy the fights.

    Comment

    • Equinox
      Undisputed Champion
      • Mar 2009
      • 1319
      • 118
      • 22
      • 7,528

      #3
      Originally posted by CrackYourJaw
      You really don't like the man do you?

      It's cool.

      To each his own. But it must ruin boxing for you, hating some one so much. Just relax and enjoy the fights.
      is what i said not true? im a boxing fan, i give credit where its due. i think pacquiao is a great fighter. but the fans, they are a different story hyping him too much. even media like fat ass dan rafael and stuppid manny steward.

      Comment

      • Left Hook Tua
        VATNIK
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2008
        • 62306
        • 7,010
        • 1,581
        • 951,318

        #4
        floyd mayweather's resume can't even hang with pacquiao's cherry picked resume.

        Comment

        • MANGLER
          Sex Tape Flop Artist
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2008
          • 30142
          • 1,705
          • 2,355
          • 46,598

          #5
          Diaz was a tuneup.
          DLH cherrypicked Pac, not vice versa.
          Hatton was lineal at JWW.
          Cotto had a title and was seen by some (not me) as the top WW.

          Comment

          • johncods
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • May 2009
            • 7761
            • 421
            • 58
            • 14,300

            #6
            Originally posted by Left Hook Tua
            floyd mayweather's resume can't even hang with pacquiao's cherry picked resume.

            Comment

            • Equinox
              Undisputed Champion
              • Mar 2009
              • 1319
              • 118
              • 22
              • 7,528

              #7
              Originally posted by Left Hook Tua
              floyd mayweather's resume can't even hang with pacquiao's cherry picked resume.
              im expecting few replys to this one, because honstly, i dont know how you could argue what i provided.

              Comment

              • jrosales13
                undisputed champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Sep 2008
                • 32632
                • 739
                • 763
                • 40,023

                #8
                Who was the #1 guy at 112?, who was considered the best at 122?, who was considered the best at 126? Who was considered the best at 130?, Who was the #1 guy at 140?

                Comment

                • Left Hook Tua
                  VATNIK
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Apr 2008
                  • 62306
                  • 7,010
                  • 1,581
                  • 951,318

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Equinox
                  im expecting few replys to this one, because honstly, i dont know how you could argue what i provided.
                  pacquiao has fought better opponents and has a better resume than mayweather.

                  deal with it.

                  Comment

                  • Equinox
                    Undisputed Champion
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 1319
                    • 118
                    • 22
                    • 7,528

                    #10
                    Originally posted by mangler
                    Diaz was a tuneup.
                    DLH cherrypicked Pac, not vice versa.
                    Hatton was lineal at JWW.
                    Cotto had a title and was seen by some (not me) as the top WW.
                    but out of the things i made note of, where they not the easiest options? i forgot to mention that seeing steve forbes bust up de la hoya must have been a scary thought for pac going in to the fight.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP