Both these points are naive. Pacquiao was 14, had little experience, threw wild punches, fought much more experienced boxers and surprisingly knocked them out. He got KO'd when he was a rookie since he basically had to learn boxing the hard way, without an amateur career. He did not start improving until Freddie Roach began training him.
Floyd on the other hand fought fighters that were less skilled than he was with much less experience, so of course he KO'd or beat them. He's had pretty much the same trainers since childhood. He's actually lost 6 times in the amateurs. So your point about him being undefeated goes out the window.
Do you think Roach should start watching tapes of Floyd's amateur losses over 10 years ago? It's ****** right? Same with Pac. His body has changed and he's filled out into the proper weight class. Little to no chance, especially with Floyd's punching power compared to Cotto's, that Pac goes down from a body shot.
Floyd on the other hand fought fighters that were less skilled than he was with much less experience, so of course he KO'd or beat them. He's had pretty much the same trainers since childhood. He's actually lost 6 times in the amateurs. So your point about him being undefeated goes out the window.
Do you think Roach should start watching tapes of Floyd's amateur losses over 10 years ago? It's ****** right? Same with Pac. His body has changed and he's filled out into the proper weight class. Little to no chance, especially with Floyd's punching power compared to Cotto's, that Pac goes down from a body shot.

Comment