When I go and research TOP welterweights of all-time, the name of Tommy Hearns(61-5-1-48ko's) always shows up, along with Duran and Leonard. I'm lucky that I saw those fighters fight. Hearns got destroyed by Hagler, yet is still considered one of the best welterweights ever. Hearns fought everyone. Why does Cotto(34-2-0-27ko's) get slammed soooo much and i see the similarities in both fighters. They both got beat by an ATG.Hearns by Hagler and Cotto by Pacquiao. They both NEVER avoided the best and at one point in their careers they were nasty.
Is it Cotto haters? Idiots? Thomas Hearns lost bad to Hagler in their Mega-fight and yet came back to finish his career strong. He first lost to Sugar Ray Leonard and then to Hagler but not many wrote him off. Cotto loses to Margarito and is written off. He comes back to fight a dangerous fighter in Clottey WINS and then loses to Pacquiao(ATG). I UNDERSTAND HE might never beat pacquiao, but c'mon look at the rest of the division and title holders.
Is it Cotto haters? Idiots? Thomas Hearns lost bad to Hagler in their Mega-fight and yet came back to finish his career strong. He first lost to Sugar Ray Leonard and then to Hagler but not many wrote him off. Cotto loses to Margarito and is written off. He comes back to fight a dangerous fighter in Clottey WINS and then loses to Pacquiao(ATG). I UNDERSTAND HE might never beat pacquiao, but c'mon look at the rest of the division and title holders.
Comment