A lot of "0"s have gone this year
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
'0's are often overrated and every fighter who retires undefeated will always have doubts and questions over competition faced (or rather competition not faced). the fact that some fighters have now lost their '0' is just a sign that big fights are being made in boxing.Comment
-
Forgot about those. Good call!
I agree. Too much stock is placed in maintaining a fighter's "0" (especially when it results in sub-par opposition), and often it's actually beneficial for them to lose it. A lot of the young guys who've lost their "0"s this year can still go onto great things. However, for some of the crappier guys it's only downhill from here.'0's are often overrated and every fighter who retires undefeated will always have doubts and questions over competition faced (or rather competition not faced). the fact that some fighters have now lost their '0' is just a sign that big fights are being made in boxing.Comment
-
I disagree about Bradley almost losing his "0".
Besides the knockdowns against Holt, Bradley controlled the fight.Comment
-
-
Comment