how come after a fighter loses..people always say they should fire thier trainer??

[larry x]

why is the trainer always to blame???boxing=2 people fighting..1 wins and 1 loses..so after every fight should a trainer be fired???what ever happened to loyalty and going through the flames together????...

[strugler]

The oscar delahoya precedence..........................

[Sir Tom Jones]

although i do not agree with firing the trainer just because of a lost, cotto needs a more experienced trainer.

[D-Omonist]

Peepz always look for excuses, and blaming the trainer is alright for them because they don't have to look down on their fighter if they gave a ****ty performance.

[larry x]

no i think santiago and cotto have a good chemistry..its just their 2nd fight together...constantly hiring and firing trainers is bad imo...

[HM_Luke]

I guess this is aimed at Cotto/Santiago? if not i'll use them as example..

Santiago is not a well known trainer people are assuming he is a bad trainer. Might be true but using an inexperienced trainer on a elite level fighter for the biggest fight in his career isn't a great move imo.

[PinoyZoi]

The only fighter who was recommended to change trainers was Cotto. Santiago does not know what hes doing. He risked Cotto's life letting him fight extra rounds.

[2501]

you need to hire a new forum trainer

[D-Omonist]

no i think santiago and cotto have a good chemistry..its just their 2nd fight together...constantly hiring and firing trainers is bad imo...

I have no idea how there boxer-trainter relationship is, but at least on those 24/7 episodes it looked like Santiago was more of his boy than a trainer.

[Rickety Cricket]

Thats the De La Hoya way