Freddie Roach says Cotto is damaged

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JudeTheObscure
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Jul 2009
    • 366
    • 32
    • 0
    • 6,540

    #11
    Was this interview BEFORE the fight?? Really?!!!

    Thats f**king brilliant. There, once again, Manny is diminished- thanks to his brilliant trainer.

    Oscar 'couldn't pull the trigger', Hatton 'is faded', and now Cotto 'is damaged'.

    What is there to admire about Manny's victories over these fighters then??

    Roach gets defensive and says "why cant it be that Manny had a good night?"

    Well its because of YOU that he didn't, Freddie- you established before the fight happened that, and opened up excuses forever.

    Manny isn't fighting anyone in their prime then- based on what Freddie Roach says. Unbelievable.

    Comment

    • PinoyZoi
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jun 2009
      • 4262
      • 249
      • 267
      • 10,829

      #12
      Ya Roach is so damn true, he even said "Mayweather is the easiest to win against". SO TRUE!!!!!

      Comment

      • one-Punch
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Apr 2005
        • 3130
        • 221
        • 224
        • 9,866

        #13
        Roach was just playing mind games. But in the end, Roach ended up saying Cotto was going to be Manny's toughest fight. Roach may be a great trainer, but hes got a big mouth. You can't listen to everything this guy says. Sometimes hes right, sometimes hes wrong, sometimes hes just talking smack.

        Comment

        • Maidana vs Rios
          m/(>.&ltm/
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • May 2009
          • 3028
          • 269
          • 597
          • 9,602

          #14
          Roach also said he doesn't see greatness in Floyd at 140 and above. Damn I guess when Manny puts Floyd to sleep he won't get any credit then either.

          Comment

          • hugh grant
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Apr 2006
            • 30115
            • 2,146
            • 818
            • 105,596

            #15
            Originally posted by JMM_135_#1
            roach seems to have a habit of discrediting pac's wins, he said oscar "cant pull the trigger anymore" that hatton "just wasnt that good" and said that cotto was damaged goods
            Even though DLH couldnt pull the trigger, and Hatton wasnt that good as Roach said. THose 2 were still good enough to take PBF to the wire. But not good enough to test Pac.
            To be able to test Pac, DLH would needed to have been in his prime. But would still have lost convincinlly. But maybe have been able to land a few on manny

            Comment

            • johncods
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • May 2009
              • 7760
              • 421
              • 58
              • 14,300

              #16
              *****s Grasping at straws as usual... U wish ur boyfriend was like pac do u?

              Comment

              • Spacey1991
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jan 2009
                • 8885
                • 247
                • 282
                • 18,684

                #17
                Pacquiao beat a very good fighter, simple as that... no excuses.

                Comment

                • Athrun340
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Sep 2009
                  • 382
                  • 19
                  • 9
                  • 8,087

                  #18
                  Roach also said Pacquiao was going to win by a UD before the fight with Cotto was signed. Then when the training camp started, he changed his prediction to Pacquiao KO in the 9th. Then weeks before the fight, roach changed his prediction again to a first round knockout.

                  bottomline, you shouldnt believe everything that comes out of roach's mouth.

                  Comment

                  • JMM_135_#1
                    Contender
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 282
                    • 9
                    • 12
                    • 6,668

                    #19
                    Originally posted by hugh grant
                    Even though DLH couldnt pull the trigger, and Hatton wasnt that good as Roach said. THose 2 were still good enough to take PBF to the wire. But not good enough to test Pac.
                    To be able to test Pac, DLH would needed to have been in his prime. But would still have lost convincinlly. But maybe have been able to land a few on manny

                    hahahaha, prime DLh beats pac comfortably

                    the thing your missing is this... pac fought DLH at 147, a weight in which he hadnt made in years... even in the tito figh the had to completly strip off to make weight ...

                    hatton was on the slide, good a win as it is pac just caught him a bit further down that slide, he got hurt twice by juan lazcano

                    Comment

                    • Maxshayne
                      Banned
                      • Jan 2009
                      • 581
                      • 76
                      • 0
                      • 657

                      #20
                      Denial Denial ya`ll.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP