Did Paulie had a statement after Pac-Cotto?

[alexpz]

First comment on Facebook was
Had cotto, but **** happens its boxing.

http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/group.php?gid=158602709699&ref=mf

why TS is banned?

He ain't banned and he won't either be banned..lolz.

[hugh grant]

Now Pac has beaten Cotto, Paul is probably gonna make excuses at to why Pac was able to beat Cotto. Paul will probably say Cotto was never the same after sharing the ring with Paul Mallignagii

[alexpz]

Now Pac has beaten Cotto, Paul is probably gonna make excuses at to why Pac was able to beat Cotto. Paul will probably say Cotto was never the same after sharing the ring with Paul Mallignagii

And Paulie will say he can also inflict those damages to Cotto too if given a rematch.

[BOX-A-LOT]

Y'all talkin' about this interview

https://<object width="560" height="...mbed></object>

I did not hear anything wrong with Paulie's pre-fight analysis. I did not sense any bias from his pick. It was based on logical thinking. He obviously has not been in the ring with PAC. But, that was the big question mark going into the PAC - Cotto matchup, whether PAC could withstand the pounding from Cotto or not.



Paulie was right, just like other observers(ie fans/boxing insiders), if PAC could withstand Cotto's bombs, then it was PAC's fight to win. If PAC couldn't weather the Cotto storm, then it was Cotto's fight. Simple as that.

[$partacus]

On his twitter page he says Pacquiao put on a clinic and beat the best WW in the world, he also says Floyd ducked Mosley and needs to man up and fight Pac.

[sneaky jepoy]

Who's the #1 Welterweight?


http://www.boxrec.com/ratings.php?se...n=Welterweight


lol

if you find that funny. (which i do)

check who is the #1 LightWelterweight at boxrec.

thats funnier!

[$partacus]

if you find that funny. (which i do)

check who is the #1 LightWelterweight at boxrec.

thats funnier!

What's so funny about that? Hatton or Bradley are the best LWW if you count Pac as a WW.