What annoys me about Bernard Hopkin's ''Fans''

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SplitSecond
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Nov 2009
    • 23151
    • 1,715
    • 1,187
    • 85,044

    #1

    What annoys me about Bernard Hopkin's ''Fans''

    is that hopkins was green against jones and past-prime against taylor.....

    jones prime was from hopkins till ruiz(apperently), yet bhops was from keith holmes to de la hoya(not sure now, just guessin the ending of his prime considering he was past it against taylor)

    anyway...what's up with that, that true?
  • Doctor_Tenma
    Monster
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Apr 2009
    • 33313
    • 1,327
    • 1,249
    • 58,127

    #2
    Originally posted by tehMatrix
    is that hopkins was green against jones and past-prime against taylor.....

    jones prime was from hopkins till ruiz(apperently), yet bhops was from keith holmes to de la hoya(not sure now, just guessin the ending of his prime considering he was past it against taylor)

    anyway...what's up with that, that true?
    You clearly haven't watched much of B-Hop, clearly. Neither was Roy at his best, both had improved.

    Comment

    • Piggu
      The Prophet
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Nov 2005
      • 8815
      • 752
      • 2,135
      • 22,719

      #3
      I still thought B-Hop won against Taylor the first time out, but I'd have to re-watch the fight to post opinions.

      Comment

      • SplitSecond
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Nov 2009
        • 23151
        • 1,715
        • 1,187
        • 85,044

        #4
        Originally posted by Dominicano Soy!
        You clearly haven't watched much of B-Hop, clearly. Neither was Roy at his best, both had improved.
        yea, clearly, i just watched everyfight from him, from him fighting jones to getting a tight draw to smashin his knee, to him tko'ing glencoffe to ko'ing felix to losing to taylor to beating winky and losing to calzaghe then winning a whiteash against pavlik

        nah, i've watched a good 29 fights

        im just saying that's what 'YOU FANS' say.

        Comment

        • ИATAS
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jul 2007
          • 36648
          • 2,509
          • 1,953
          • 50,835

          #5
          well neither Jones nor Hopkins were in their primes when they fought waaaaay back in '93, although Jones was the more polished of the two being that he had a great amateur career and of course fought in the Olympics during which hopkins was in prison for 4-5 years.

          And Hopkins lost to Jermain Taylor at age 40. It's not really a stretch to say a 40 year old fighter is past his prime.

          Personally, I think his absolute peak of his career was from 1999-2002 (when I say peak, I mean both physically and mentally he was at his absolute best). There is no question he started to slow down by the time he fought taylor, actually you can notice differences before the Taylor fight

          Comment

          • boxasmash
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Aug 2008
            • 7039
            • 222
            • 63
            • 14,591

            #6
            Hopkins really isn't that far bast his prime right now.

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP