dirrell-THE RUNNING MAN...

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Klitschko2010
    Banned
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Jul 2009
    • 330
    • 43
    • 4
    • 403

    #31
    LMFAO. I'm starting to think this guy IS Froch.

    Comment

    • REMOVED SHARK 97
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Apr 2009
      • 3909
      • 134
      • 124
      • 5,753

      #32
      Difference is Dirrell Clinched every 5 seconds and was negative.

      Haye was facing a 7 foot, 22 stone giant ... and didn't clinch!, hell the only clinch there was prob intiated by Valuev!!.

      Comment

      • MidnightSpecial
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Oct 2009
        • 11412
        • 596
        • 269
        • 23,646

        #33
        Originally posted by Arcyani
        Difference is Dirrell Clinched every 5 seconds and was negative.

        Haye was facing a 7 foot, 22 stone giant ... and didn't clinch!, hell the only clinch there was prob intiated by Valuev!!.
        Even though i dont draw a comparison between the two fights... haye would have been an idiot to clinch since it would have givin valuev a chance to lean on him and wear him out,which Valuev does in alot of his fights. plus Froch is a better fighter than Valuev but hell who isnt? Even though i give slimshandy **** for his nut hugging it is Dirrells own fault for the loss. but it was what it was scored...a close fight with no definent winner. If Dirrell wouldnt have clinched and acted GREEN he would have won hands down. Despite what the dip**** slimshandy says

        Comment

        • slimshandy69
          I HAVE ***** TATTOO!
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Aug 2009
          • 3642
          • 323
          • 3
          • 16,514

          #34
          Originally posted by USA_Pugilist
          Even though i dont draw a comparison between the two fights... haye would have been an idiot to clinch since it would have givin valuev a chance to lean on him and wear him out,which Valuev does in alot of his fights. plus Froch is a better fighter than Valuev but hell who isnt? Even though i give slimshandy **** for his nut hugging it is Dirrells own fault for the loss. but it was what it was scored...a close fight with no definent winner. If Dirrell wouldnt have clinched and acted GREEN he would have won hands down. Despite what the dip**** slimshandy says
          but he ddint do those things..ate froches jab all night hence the blood and sweeling and was inactive for most of the night..

          It says it all that his onyl dcent round was a point deduction for rightfully holding and cheating...

          froch 26-0...whos next...

          Comment

          • King_Lukas
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Oct 2008
            • 250
            • 29
            • 27
            • 6,525

            #35
            Originally posted by slimshandy69
            disagree...dirrel was hardly ever in range because of running...when he was i range he would hold because he was eating so many points scoring jabs or duck his head illegaly below frochs groin area and show the back of it..

            its outragous that this fight was even a split decision, froch should have a unanimous...
            Everything you have wrote is patent bollocks, and no cleverly edited gifs or BS videos will prove your dellusions, and please don't use names like Steve Bunce to prove your arguments, people like him always over hype our fighters here in the UK.

            Hit and dont get hit, that means avoiding punches, yes Dirrell moved alot and tried to avoid Frochs ****ing punches but who wouldnt.

            Dirrell was robbed plain and simple, came to Frochs back yard and made him look limited and frustrated, and theres no way Froch outlanded dirrell over 12 rounds, his jabs were ineffective.

            Remind me who hurt who in the last few rounds and whos limited style bacame so frustrated and one dimensional that he had to resort to pathetic body slams as your gif kindly shows.

            This split decision is again yet more evidence that judging over here in Britain is a joke and judges are more worried about flailing aggressive looking movement than they are actually watching for punches landing....proof of this? Watch practically every Calzaghe fight.

            Comment

            • rskumm21
              Banned
              • Dec 2008
              • 2640
              • 199
              • 175
              • 3,033

              #36
              You again?

              Comment

              • K2ray
                Contender
                • Nov 2007
                • 229
                • 27
                • 0
                • 6,893

                #37
                Originally posted by King_Lukas
                Everything you have wrote is patent bollocks, and no cleverly edited gifs or BS videos will prove your dellusions, and please don't use names like Steve Bunce to prove your arguments, people like him always over hype our fighters here in the UK.

                Hit and dont get hit, that means avoiding punches, yes Dirrell moved alot and tried to avoid Frochs ****ing punches but who wouldnt.

                Dirrell was robbed plain and simple, came to Frochs back yard and made him look limited and frustrated, and theres no way Froch outlanded dirrell over 12 rounds, his jabs were ineffective.

                Remind me who hurt who in the last few rounds and whos limited style bacame so frustrated and one dimensional that he had to resort to pathetic body slams as your gif kindly shows.

                This split decision is again yet more evidence that judging over here in Britain is a joke and judges are more worried about flailing aggressive looking movement than they are actually watching for punches landing....proof of this? Watch practically every Calzaghe fight.
                Well said. This slimwhateverhisname is probably some HattonBot from the BS UK biased boxing site ESB!

                Comment

                • Bad Boy Dazza
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Dec 2008
                  • 1150
                  • 44
                  • 157
                  • 7,373

                  #38
                  Haye didn't keep holding his head down to the ground to avoid being hit. I personally feel this was akin to cheating. Now just to be clear i'm not talking about bobbing and weaving, I am talking about putting your head down and keeping it down when you are cornered - it is sort of like going down on a knee, and should be penalized (and the judges obviously felt the same way).

                  Originally posted by Pullcounter
                  dirrell and haye had the same gameplan, but somehow haye won and dirrell lost. isn't that peculiar.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  TOP