why Dirrell blew it (video)

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Klitschko2010
    Banned
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Jul 2009
    • 330
    • 43
    • 4
    • 403

    #11
    Originally posted by Princemanspopa
    Quite hilarious that the Froch apologists have to list such tactics on Dirrells parts to justify Froch winning.I suggest some of you actually learn how to score a fight.Andre Dirrell won that fight and it wasn't even close.You score a fight based upon clean punches,no ineffective aggression,not clear missed punches.

    Dirrell got robbed in quite possibly the worst decision of this year.Carl Froch will always lose to a fighter with great speed and decent enough boxing skills.Pascal fought Froch in his own fight,had he boxed then he would have shut Carl "the sloth" Froch out of the fight.
    Had Dirrell not been so **** and stunned badly twice in the fight then he would have won but oh well!!

    Comment

    • slimshandy69
      I HAVE ***** TATTOO!
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Aug 2009
      • 3642
      • 323
      • 3
      • 16,514

      #12
      Originally posted by tehMatrix
      one of his big problems, he actually CANT fight on the inside
      it's very important he learns how to, cuz atleast even if he decides to hold he can do some damage and not make it look like just holdin on to survive

      still tho, pretty clear he was robbed
      froch was hitting nothin

      thats why eeryone on this thread feel froch won???

      leanr what a robbery is...a robbery is a holyfield lewis 1 or a shogun machida in ufc..

      Froch won the fight and even people who amazing thought dirrell won only just scored it for him...

      all the top pundits scored it for froch including espn...

      Obviously youll have it 118-110 to dirrell but you are ****ing ugly prick...you even claimed it was carl froch fans that were hating on gayemaker on this forum...

      Comment

      • SplitSecond
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Nov 2009
        • 23151
        • 1,715
        • 1,187
        • 85,044

        #13
        Originally posted by slimshandy69
        thats why eeryone on this thread feel froch won???

        leanr what a robbery is...a robbery is a holyfield lewis 1 or a shogun machida in ufc..

        Froch won the fight and even people who amazing thought dirrell won only just scored it for him...

        all the top pundits scored it for froch including espn...

        Obviously youll have it 118-110 to dirrell but you are ****ing ugly prick...you even claimed it was carl froch fans that were hating on gayemaker on this forum...
        i did?......

        Comment

        • Princemanspopa
          Banned
          • Oct 2009
          • 329
          • 28
          • 0
          • 440

          #14
          Originally posted by Klitschko2010
          Had Dirrell not been so **** and stunned badly twice in the fight then he would have won but oh well!!

          Froch looked like **** and got hurt twice not Dirrell.Had Froch actually landed a punch or two then he would have been given a justified decision but oh well.


          Originally posted by slimshandy69
          thats why eeryone on this thread feel froch won???

          leanr what a robbery is...a robbery is a holyfield lewis 1 or a shogun machida in ufc..

          Froch won the fight and even people who amazing thought dirrell won only just scored it for him...

          all the top pundits scored it for froch including espn...

          Obviously youll have it 118-110 to dirrell but you are ****ing ugly prick...you even claimed it was carl froch fans that were hating on gayemaker on this forum...

          Learn to type properly,idiot.On what basis were you giving Carl "the sloth" Froch rounds? You do know that ineffective aggression doesn't count right? You do know that missed punches don't count right?

          Froch didn't win one single round clearly,even when Dirrell got deducted a point,Froch still didn't win that round.
          Last edited by Princemanspopa; 11-13-2009, 04:39 PM.

          Comment

          • oaklandstephen
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Apr 2007
            • 2457
            • 168
            • 3
            • 9,085

            #15
            dirrell got robbed froch got a home town SPLIT DECISION

            Comment

            • adietheforestfa
              Forest till i die!
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jun 2006
              • 1443
              • 154
              • 320
              • 8,665

              #16
              Just checked box rec. Says Froch won, and is STILL undefeated. END OF, stop bitchin!!

              Comment

              • slimshandy69
                I HAVE ***** TATTOO!
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Aug 2009
                • 3642
                • 323
                • 3
                • 16,514

                #17
                Originally posted by Princemanspopa
                Froch looked like **** and got hurt twice not Dirrell.Had Froch actually landed a punch or two then he would have been given a justified decision but oh well.





                Learn to type properly,idiot.On what basis were you giving Carl "the sloth" Froch rounds? You do know that ineffective aggression doesn't count right? You do know that missed punches don't count right?

                Froch didn't win one single round clearly,even when Dirrell got deducted a point,Froch still didn't win that round.
                exactly dirrells only good round wa sa draw...

                froch didnt land???lmaooooo are you stevie wonder reincarnated as ray charles in disguise???

                My big fat sig shows otherwise about froch not landing pmsl..

                watch this highlight reel of the super 6...they hardl showed any punches landed from dirrell??because he didnt land any puches..

                Hence why froch was unmarked after 12 and dirrell was bloodied in the nose and lips after 4 rounds..

                Comment

                • Klitschko2010
                  Banned
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Jul 2009
                  • 330
                  • 43
                  • 4
                  • 403

                  #18
                  Froch stunned Dirrell badly in round 9 with the big left hook and also slightly less so when he landed the big right on Dirrell.

                  When Dirrell tagged Froch, he was a warrior who covered up and used some good defense instead of holding like a *****. Also, Froch came straight back showing his authority.

                  Comment

                  • Baby Monkey
                    Interim Champion
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Jul 2007
                    • 546
                    • 49
                    • 1
                    • 6,691

                    #19
                    I thought it was a close fight, but Dirrell's style made it very boring and ugly.

                    Whilst I like the man, i dont like the plan.

                    I'd also add that despite only get hit a couple of times, he was bleeding from the nose,eye and mouth with only a couple of heavy blows from froch.

                    Comment

                    • Akyra
                      Banned
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Sep 2009
                      • 11643
                      • 357
                      • 207
                      • 12,259

                      #20
                      dirrell sucks and he's booooooooring.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP