NO pacquiao vs Cotto rematch clause (LA TIMES)

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rob6465
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Nov 2007
    • 1850
    • 36
    • 1
    • 8,362

    #1

    NO pacquiao vs Cotto rematch clause (LA TIMES)

    Pacquiao-Cotto bout has no rematch clause
    November 12, 2009 | 11:49 am
    In crafting the deal that is allowing Saturday night's Manny Pacquiao-Miguel Cotto welterweight championship bout, promoter Bob Arum provided guaranteed purses of $7.5 million to Pacquiao and $4 million to Cotto.

    The contract also allowed the promoter to extend his deals with each fighter. Cotto is now under contract with Arum's Top Rank company until the end of 2011, Arum said, and Pacquiao's Top Rank deal was extended until the end of 2012.

    One provision that was left out was a rematch clause that would allow either fighter to seek a rematch if they desired.

    "It never came up," Arum said. "These were intense negotiations. To throw that in was an added element would've put negotiations on hold for probably two more weeks."

    Privately, the Top Rank camp has expressed a desire for Saturday's bout to be a compelling bout that would allow a rematch to occur.

    The alternatives to a convincing victory by either fighter could be problematic to create. If Pacquiao wins the 145-pound welterweight bout in lopsided fashion, fight fans will of course clamor for a showdown against unbeaten Floyd Mayweather Jr., a former Top Rank boxer whose relationship with Arum is strained, to put it mildly.

    Should Cotto overwhelm Pacquiao, Arum is pushing for a rematch with Antonio Margarito as "a fight everyone wants to see." Margarito is currently without a license after being caught with plaster-hardened inserts in his hand wraps before a January fight against Shane Mosley. Cotto said he suspects Margarito had loaded gloves in their July 2008 bout won by Margarito via 11th-round TKO, and Cotto's father said he doesn't want a rematch to occur.

    "No way," Miguel Sr. told The Times Wednesday.

    The Pacquiao-Cotto rematch, thus, is a strong fallback option, but first requires a compelling duel Saturday night.

    "It's all well and good to refer to me as the chessmaster, but these guys have managers and advisors, and I won't be able to do a rematch by snapping my fingers," Arum said. "I can't just make the pieces on the board fall into place."

    --Lance Pugmire
  • -MAKAVELLI-
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Aug 2008
    • 50080
    • 3,580
    • 2,792
    • 169,000

    #2
    by the 6th round when PAC begins to tee off on Cotto, noone's gonna even think about a rematch..

    Comment

    • RenovatioPR
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Apr 2009
      • 444
      • 15
      • 70
      • 6,634

      #3
      Originally posted by Makavelli
      by the 6th round when PAC begins to tee off on Cotto, noone's gonna even think about a rematch..
      Hey Mak ..... you know it can go both ways.

      But the sure thing it is going to be a great match.

      Comment

      • Ray*
        Be safe!!!
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jul 2005
        • 44867
        • 1,654
        • 1,608
        • 558,890

        #4
        No need for it since both are signed to Top rank, If they want a rematch it would be a done deal easily.

        Comment

        • -MAKAVELLI-
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Aug 2008
          • 50080
          • 3,580
          • 2,792
          • 169,000

          #5
          Originally posted by RenovatioPR
          Hey Mak ..... you know it can go both ways.

          But the sure thing it is going to be a great match.


          Ren, its fight week brutha...the only time i can go full homer

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP