Freddie Roach "Mosley will destroy Cotto"

[El Angel]

Shows Roach's predictions aren't always right. Hope he doesn't underestimate Cotto again.

[USA]

mosley beat cotto... check my sig... you can also take a look at the pac/cotto compustat analysis to see that my analysis and their analysis is exactly the same.

I watched the fight in full HD at 60fps several times sitting 2' away. I thought Cotto won the fight clearly, but it was close. I'm not even a Cotto fan and I bet on Mosley to destroy Margarito.

Point is, Roach thought Cotto was a bum and Mosley would walk through him. It didn't happen. I'm asking peeps if they know what Roach said AFTER the fight.

[el malo]

So roachadamus was wrong once? lol

[Pullcounter]

I watched the fight in full HD at 60fps several times sitting 2' away. I thought Cotto won the fight clearly, but it was close. I'm not even a Cotto fan and I bet on Mosley to destroy Margarito.

Point is, Roach thought Cotto was a bum and Mosley would walk through him. It didn't happen. I'm asking peeps if they know what Roach said AFTER the fight.

i didn't ask you to rewatch the fight, i'm asking you to check out the punch stats analysis.

[Blue Heffner]

Someone should tie Roach up and let Margarito beat his ass with loaded gloves.

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

i didn't ask you to rewatch the fight, i'm asking you to check out the punch stats analysis.

Look numb-nuts, first of all Cotto won clearly 8-4 in rounds, let make that clear.

Second, Compubox is a ****** like you pressing buttons at ringside, so those numbers most of the time are wrong and in some cases way off. So I will trust my eyes better than his.

Third Compubox numbers its not the all end all. Even if someone landed more punches than the other guy that doesnt mean, that guy won the fight. In a 4 rounds fight I could outland you 15-11 in the first round, 17-12 in the second, 34-30 in the third and the you outlands me 48-21. Does that means you won the fight, because at the end you landed more punches? I guess not!

And fourth boxing is not score by landed punches, thats how Amateur boxing is scored.


Now STFU!!!!

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

Look numb-nuts, first of all Cotto won clearly 8-4 in rounds, let make that clear.

Second, Compubox is a ****** like you pressing buttons at ringside, so those numbers most of the time are wrong and in some cases way off. So I will trust my eyes better than his.

Third Compubox numbers its not the all end all. Even if someone landed more punches than the other guy that doesnt mean, that guy won the fight. In a 4 rounds fight I could outland you 15-11 in the first round, 17-12 in the second, 34-30 in the third and the you outlands me 48-21. Does that means you won the fight, because at the end you landed more punches? I guess not!

And fourth boxing is not score by landed punches, thats how Amateur boxing is scored.


Now STFU!!!!

I guess this numb-nuts went AWOL!!!!

[Pullcounter]

Look numb-nuts, first of all Cotto won clearly 8-4 in rounds, let make that clear.

hell no... what a biased scoring of rounds.

Second, Compubox is a ****** like you pressing buttons at ringside, so those numbers most of the time are wrong and in some cases way off.

it still captured the essense of my argument: that cotto gases after the 6th

So I will trust my eyes better than his.

we've already established your "eyes" as biased.

Third Compubox numbers its not the all end all. Even if someone landed more punches than the other guy that doesnt mean, that guy won the fight. In a 4 rounds fight I could outland you 15-11 in the first round, 17-12 in the second, 34-30 in the third and the you outlands me 48-21. Does that means you won the fight, because at the end you landed more punches? I guess not!

that's why I analyzed the punch stats round by round, not overall. mosley still wins.

And fourth boxing is not score by landed punches, thats how Amateur boxing is scored.

the most important criteria is clean effective punching... which is what mosley did. he got robbed.

Now STFU!!!!

um........ no

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

hell no... what a biased scoring of rounds.


it still captured the essense of my argument: that cotto gases after the 6th

we've already established your "eyes" as biased.


that's why I analyzed the punch stats round by round, not overall. mosley still wins.


the most important criteria is clean effective punching... which is what mosley did. he got robbed.


um........ no

1. Im bias but you arent, right?
2. Nope it doesnt I was just provin a point. Cotto won rounds 9 and 11 rather easily. No gassin just smart boxing.
3.And yours are not. Sure
4. ROunds by rounds Mosley got schooled and the final compuox numbers where garbage, and even if they where corect they landed the same amount of puches, how is that a robbery?
5.hell, no. the more cleaner,effective punches where landed by Cotto



I see your agenda is to agravate people. But it doest matter, most experts, boxing sites, fans and others had Cotto wining, so your hater opinion meanst ****. In the end Cotto outboxed the **** out of Mosley and won a clear hard fought competitive fight ad you have to suck on it!!

[Pullcounter]

1. Im bias but you arent, right?

yeah, cause i'm using the punch stats to make my argument, i'm not using my own opinion of the fight to make my case

2. Nope it doesnt I was just provin a point. Cotto won rounds 9 and 11 rather easily. No gassin just smart boxing.

he gased... the compubox numbers for the mosley/cotto and cotto/clottey prove it.

3.And yours are not. Sure

again, i'm using someone else's punch stats to make my case, not my own.

4. ROunds by rounds Mosley got schooled and the final compuox numbers where garbage, and even if they where corect they landed the same amount of puches, how is that a robbery?

what? you need to look at the stats again... mosley landed more punches and more power punches than cotto did. the only thing cotto did was land more jabs.

mosley got robbed in MSG.

5.hell, no. the more cleaner,effective punches where landed by Cotto

the cleaner effective jabs maybe... but mosley was ****ing cotto up with bombs.

I see your agenda is to agravate people. But it doest matter, most experts, boxing sites, fans and others had Cotto wining, so your hater opinion meanst ****. In the end Cotto outboxed the **** out of Mosley and won a clear hard fought competitive fight ad you have to suck on it!!

1) my agenda is to expose the truth: mosley beat cotto

2) public opinion doesn't make something true

3) cotto didn't outbox ****... he got a gift decision over mosley in MSG.

4) and you have to live w/ the fact that mosley was robbed in msg.