We can pick apart every boxers resume all day

[The Gambler1981]

I try to be nice about it when people do this and point out that it can be done to any fighter.

Criticism is one thing but really looking at just negatives and cutting dudes down is not really valid criticism.

It would be nice to see some more positive outlooks on the sport.

[ummid]

We get too critical on here some......most of the time but as obsessed hardcore fans if we don't pick apart the bull**** fights that are billed as great wins that the casual fan doesn't know any better about due to being un-informed, then no one can or will.....I personally believe that the posters on here, not the trolls and alts but the real fans who love boxing on here are the most knowledgeable and informed boxing fans in the world.....The fact that some can even come up with a solid criticism of a fighters whole career on here is a credit the the dedication and interest of the fans on this site.
If flimsy resumes are not picked apart a skilled fighter can fight nothing but over matched opposition and no one would no better and he can get a legacy he doesn't really deserve, so to those who do fair and neutral research thank you.

call me crazy but when someone starts picking a fighter's resume, i can hardly call that being neutral. nine times out of ten, when someone starts discrediting a boxer's wins that poster most like has a motive either to downplay the said boxer, to bring up some other fighter, get the fans of the said fighter pissed, or to try and soothe the poster's sense of bitterness over the said fighter.

being knowledgeable and informed doesn't excuse anyone from ****ting on someone's well-earned wins.

[gorasikawannabe]

I agree with you, but Hopkins beat an undefeated Calslappy too! Hopkins acheivements are legendary mainly because of the tender age he is doing it at. Also, he moved up nearly 2 divisions himself so there goes your theory out of the window