If Mosely couldnt beat Cotto

[Pullcounter]

Doesn't change the fact that Pacquiao's body has grown alot since, as did Mayweather's.

yes, but pac isn't a legit WW... floyd is a legit WW.

Cotto is the underdog.

he shouldn't be

[Sin City]

Because that was the same crappy version of Mosley that went on to struggle against Ricardo Mayorga. Mosley is better now with ****m Richardson, and I don't really use that as a gauge for this fight. That version of Mosley is better than the last three opponents that Pac have fought though. I'm not denying that.

That's a ****** post. Cotto lost to a bum then.

you are so full of ****. I was rooting for Mosley in that fight and he lost.
Even he'll admit he lost.
Yeah, Mosley is better now that he's 2 years older then he was then.
you are such a hater.

[firstborn]

Why is the thread so ******? You can say styles make fights all you want but the bottom line is Mosely presented a bigger challenge to Cotto than Pac does. It makes sense that if Cotto can handle a strong, fast Mosely then he can handle the less physically imposing Pac. Just trying to point out that Pac aint bringing nothing that Cotto aint seen before. Pac on the other hand has never fought anyone like Cotto.

[Doctor_Tenma]

yes, but pac isn't a legit WW... floyd is a legit WW.





he shouldn't be

Cotto isn't that much bigger, size isn't gonna be the only factor. Pacquiao has more of the advantages and should win in my opinion. Most ATG's have faced bigger opponents, Pacquiao should win; dude has the tools.

[Pullcounter]

you are so full of ****. I was rooting for Mosley in that fight and he lost.

liar... you wasn't rooting for mosley

Even he'll admit he lost.

link or it never happened.

Yeah, Mosley is better now that he's 2 years older then he was then.
you are such a hater.

then how did mosley destroy margo while cotto was forced to quit?

[Doctor_Tenma]

Why is the thread so ******? You can say styles make fights all you want but the bottom line is Mosely presented a bigger challenge to Cotto than Pac does. It makes sense that if Cotto can handle a strong, fast Mosely then he can handle the less physically imposing Pac. Just trying to point out that Pac aint bringing nothing that Cotto aint seen before. Pac on the other hand has never fought anyone like Cotto.

Cotto was faster then Shane in their bout. Pacquiao is noticeably faster then Shane, more consistent, way better stamina, very quick feet (Where as Shane doesn't have his legs anymore), better combination puncher. Two completely different boxers and stylistically Paquiao poses the bigger threat.

[iHateThePacMan]

Cotto isn't that much bigger, size isn't gonna be the only factor. Pacquiao has more of the advantages and should win in my opinion. Most ATG's have faced bigger opponents, Pacquiao should win; dude has the tools.

give me that girls name on your sig and avatar dammit

[Pullcounter]

Cotto isn't that much bigger, size isn't gonna be the only factor. Pacquiao has more of the advantages and should win in my opinion. Most ATG's have faced bigger opponents, Pacquiao should win; dude has the tools.

1) you kidding me? cotto will be 10+ lbs bigger than pac on fight night.

2) only advantage pac has is speed

3) cotto should win, he's the bigger guy

4) pac's been beating bigger opponents, but at WW he's gone one division too far

[IMDAZED]

I'm not so sure Cotto has the power advantage. Strength? Yes. Power? Umm...

[Pullcounter]

Cotto was faster then Shane in their bout. Pacquiao is noticeably faster then Shane, more consistent, way better stamina, very quick feet (Where as Shane doesn't have his legs anymore), better combination puncher. Two completely different boxers and stylistically Paquiao poses the bigger threat.

1) cotto was not faster, but he has better timing

2) pac and ssm have about the same speed, same stamina

3) pac has better movement and is a better combination puncher

4) pac stylistically does pose a bigger threat, but pac is too small to hurt cotto.

all points lead too a cotto victory.