Who is the better boxer? Khan or Haye?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hammerhiem
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2008
    • 4877
    • 129
    • 102
    • 11,163

    #11
    Originally posted by Freddy Krueger
    People vote for Haye hate ******s, Khan has more talent in his pinky finger then Haye has in his whole entire body.
    or alternatively they might be of the opinion that proving skills against world class opponents means more than showing skills against school teachers.

    Comment

    • SplitSecond
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Nov 2009
      • 23151
      • 1,715
      • 1,187
      • 85,044

      #12
      yea....no not really, and i've seen all of khans fights and i dont see this skill of his, he's only fought bums, he's weak as hell, punches like a woman, and his speed is way overrated...esspecially for such a big welterweight

      think about it, who'd you have as the favourite in a pound 4 pound hypthetical showdown between haye and khan?

      Comment

      • Gojira
        Pumping Iron
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Apr 2008
        • 5369
        • 276
        • 325
        • 14,605

        #13
        Originally posted by Freddy Krueger
        Who is it and why? I think its Khan because he actually engages with his opponents and lands alot of punches on them, while Haye lands like 3-4 shots on his opponents then runs around the ring like a school girl and shows poor ring general-ship. Khan also has a fairly good defense ever since he was KO'd by prescott while Haye leaves his hands low alot of the time.
        Haye got stopped while gassed by a experienced carl thompson who took hayes best while khan got knock out by an unheard of prescott who was a nobody.

        you have obviously never seen any of hayes other fights. he always goes for the ko.

        Comment

        • Hyde
          Banned
          • Nov 2009
          • 467
          • 41
          • 4
          • 608

          #14
          Originally posted by Freddy Krueger
          Who is it and why? I think its Khan because he actually engages with his opponents and lands alot of punches on them, while Haye lands like 3-4 shots on his opponents then runs around the ring like a school girl and shows poor ring general-ship. Khan also has a fairly good defense ever since he was KO'd by prescott while Haye leaves his hands low alot of the time.
          he has done this for ONE fight for **** sake, did he only throw 4 shots and run against Mormeck? Did he do it against Barrett? Did he do it against Maccarinelli? No he did not, the only time he did it was against a 7'2 300 pound Valuev.

          youre a ****in idiot.

          Comment

          • boxasmash
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Aug 2008
            • 7039
            • 222
            • 63
            • 14,591

            #15
            "Khan actually engages his opponents" Haye engages a lot more than Khan does, I can tell you've only seen 1 Haye fight.



            Comment

            • Bushidō
              GGG-Unit
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jul 2009
              • 6184
              • 131
              • 46
              • 13,003

              #16
              Khan is the better technical boxer

              Comment

              • boxasmash
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Aug 2008
                • 7039
                • 222
                • 63
                • 14,591

                #17
                Boxer - puncher.

                Comment

                • z0jo
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Oct 2009
                  • 1094
                  • 64
                  • 56
                  • 7,408

                  #18
                  Originally posted by tehMatrix
                  yea....no not really, and i've seen all of khans fights and i dont see this skill of his, he's only fought bums, he's weak as hell, punches like a woman, and his speed is way overrated...esspecially for such a big welterweight

                  think about it, who'd you have as the favourite in a pound 4 pound hypthetical showdown between haye and khan?
                  I agree with everything you said except for khans speed being overrated.

                  Comment

                  • hookoutofhell
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Dec 2007
                    • 2752
                    • 82
                    • 52
                    • 9,101

                    #19
                    khan is the better boxer but i have a feeling haye is the more talented fighter and will accomplish more in the sport.

                    Comment

                    • -ALT-
                      Banned
                      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                      • Nov 2009
                      • 237
                      • 17
                      • 17
                      • 364

                      #20
                      Originally posted by tehMatrix
                      khan has'nt really stepped up so we cant say
                      Yes he has.

                      ****** fanboy

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP