*** Which is more likely? *** PAC VS COTTO

[MexicanMauler]

Which is more likely to happen?

Cotto loses because he is a shot fighter (like many believe), after the ruthless beating he received at the hands of Antonio Margarito.

OR


Pacman loses due to the many distractions he's had, like getting ready to campaign for President of the Philippines and shooting the Hollywood blockbuster, "Wapakman".


Basically my question is, if Cotto really a shot fighter? Is Pac Man under prepared (mentally and/or physically)?

[..WaRSpencE..]

they're both coming in 100%..

[Syf]

why is it..

that if Cotto loses, he's automatically shot?

Thats the type of **** I'm talking about people doing too often with other fighters too.

People give a fighter no leeway once he loses.

Maybe Cotto will be going into that fight mentally and physically prepared, and will just lose to the better man.?

and the vice versa for Pac?

But there always has to be an excuse

[..WaRSpencE..]

why is it..

that if Cotto loses, he's automatically shot?

Thats the type of **** I'm talking about people doing too often with other fighters too.

People give a fighter no leeway once he loses.

Maybe Cotto will be going into that fight mentally and physically prepared, and will just lose to the better man.?

and the vice versa for Pac?

But there always has to be an excuse

I originally posted that..but didn't feel like arguing so I switched it..lol

[CrackYourJaw]

Cotto's not shot. Dude fought and won one-eyed against Clottey, even though I think I had that fight a draw.

No excuses for either guy.

[Syf]

I originally posted that..but didn't feel like arguing so I switched it..lol

lol well I'm glad I'm not the only one