ESPN E:60 Tonight

[johnm is...]

On ESPN tonight at 7:00 est one of the segments on E:60 is "Investigating the Death of Arturo Gatti"

It will probably only be a 10 minute segment or so, but it could be interesting. Anyway, thought I'd give a heads up.

[johnm is...]

Bump. 30 minutes.

[johnm is...]

Bump. Starting now.

[airplane]

Bump. Starting now.

i would like to know what intiated the fight between him and her?
did anybody notice the distance from the staircase to the ground in relation to where paulo alberes (chief investigator)was standing?
when paulo was asked the possibility of someone else possibly being involved, he just simply said no it wasn't???? that's it..no further explanation???

[- v e t -]

dammit, i wish i would have watched it... thanks for the heads up though!

[EchoTheFaith]

I have a question myself........... Last night on ESPN 60, They interviewed the taxi driver, which he said they were fighting,angry etc etc BUT!!!!

here it says, Amanda's driver -- perhaps the last person, other than Amanda and Arturo Jr., to see Gatti alive -- told ESPN that Gatti looked sad, not angry, and that the couple walked into their room quietly.

Why did they all said she was beaten by Gatti if all she had was a scratch? Where is the knife that they first introduced....speaking of the knife, On ESPN 60 they show a picture of the back of Gatti's head, why is that the knife looks like the right thing that would make that gash and not the stones or bike?

Why i that she was smiling when they asked her "How are you without your husband.." and they suddenly try to cry but fail.....miserably... BECAUSE SHE'S A

Finally, now If all of you people actually pay attention to previous articles that first came out, you can totally see that the story is being CHANGED BIG TIME. For one she went from having no alibi to having a whole cover story. At first they said that Gatti went to pick her up from his apartment...........now how was he with her? why wasn't the people mentioned before about the rocks and bike? the guy who claimed to be beaten by Gatti, looked quite alright to be honest, Personally If a boxer beat me, broke my jaw etc I think I'd have scars, maybe a fainted bruise.....and WAIT wasn't it supposedly the hotel guy that came out to help her or a guard guy? this guy looked like a normal guy on the street......strange...

Anyways, I think she's a liar and she's lying, I think there are way more in the shadows that has yet been discovered... and I think she's beyond guilty....I mean she lied about being a stripper for crying out loud......and WHOOPS PICTURE LEAKS!

[EchoTheFaith]

i would like to know what intiated the fight between him and her?
did anybody notice the distance from the staircase to the ground in relation to where paulo alberes (chief investigator)was standing?
when paulo was asked the possibility of someone else possibly being involved, he just simply said no it wasn't???? that's it..no further explanation???

Yes, He could have tiptoe and help would been fine. What catches my attention was where is the knife? They claimed to have found that next to the body.......but where is it?

Also how is it impossible for her to have let men in while he was drugged up? He clearly states it's a 100% Impossible........either that guy is really ignorant and ******ed or he's just trying to prove his case...

[airplane]

Yes, He could have tiptoe and help would been fine. What catches my attention was where is the knife? They claimed to have found that next to the body.......but where is it?

Also how is it impossible for her to have let men in while he was drugged up? He clearly states it's a 100% Impossible........either that guy is really ignorant and ******ed or he's just trying to prove his case...

you pointed out some very interesting items worthy of attention in this post the your previous. I am not convinced, at all, with Paulo alberes's conclusion, explanation, decisicion......or whatever else he has to say....there are too many holes

[EchoTheFaith]

you pointed out some very interesting items worthy of attention in this post the your previous. I am not convinced, at all, with Paulo alberes's conclusion, explanation, decisicion......or whatever else he has to say....there are too many holes

Oh far to many