Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who has more NAMES on their resume: Pac or Mayweather?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    if floyd was'nt american, hed be a regular champion like nate campbell...

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Jiddu Dali View Post
      lol....

      b4 2003 & b4 he fought Berrera..Pac was 37-2-1 <<< ...35 of those 40 fights were in Asia vs nobodies....AND HE WAS KO'ED IN 2 OF THEM vs guys who were scrubs
      Floyd's fought a bunch of nobodies too. But his are worse cuz' he's doing it in the later portion of his career and charging ppv for it.

      I answered your silly question.

      EM, MAB, JMM>>>Anything Floyds ever done.

      Comment


      • #33
        Technically it's Pacquiao, he has 56 fights. If you have fought more fighters then mathematically it's only fair that you have more chances to fight more better fighters, it's only fair and it's the least you can have over a guy with 40 fights.

        A Floyd Mayweather Jr with 56 fights would have probably had more bigger and better names than a Pacquiao with 56 fights. But not to be a nuthugger, I think that Floyd being compared to someone that has 16 more fights than him as in who fought more notable opponents, and a guy who has fought in more weight classes than Mayweather, says a lot to me. 56 fights vs 40 fights and then the guy with 40 fights is not way off in terms of better-names-fought-comparison, it makes you think who was Pacquiao fighting for most of his career?

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by baracuda View Post
          if floyd was'nt american, hed be a regular champion like nate campbell...
          If Floyd wasn't american,

          he wouldn't get a pass by the press for avoiding the toughest fights.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Jiddu Dali View Post
            NO NO NO..i know how many WORLD CHAMPS Pac has beat and I Know how many Mayweather has beat...

            i want u to tell me....this is a no brainer

            its clearly apparent Mayweather has more WORLD CHAMPS on his resume than Pac
            Better question.....Who's got more lineal titles?

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by MaD vEiN View Post
              man, you've got some twisted logic there

              EVERY BOXER FIGHTS NOBODIES EARLY IN THEIR CAREERS!

              who did Floyd fought in his 1st 10 fights?

              are they world champs?
              UM Mayweather was 17-0 when he won world title from Hernandez....16 steup fights is nowhere near 35...pac has at least 20 more chump fights on his resume than Mayweather

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by shadeyfizzle View Post
                Better question.....Who's got more lineal titles?
                Even better question?


                Who do the fans respect and accept more?

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Jiddu Dali View Post
                  DISCLAIMER THIS IS NOT A THREAD ABOUT WHO IS THE BETTER FIGHTER.......

                  I see this thread today about "Who's resume is better" and it was totally overwhelming for Pac like at least 100 people voted for Pac over Mayweather. It made be wonder are these people who voted really convinced that Pacquiao has a better resume than Mayweather from top to bottom? Or is it just typical Mayweather hate?

                  When comparing resume's I notice a lot of Pac supporters ONLY bring up the 3 mexican fighters he fought. I dont think either of them have GLORIFIED resume's but in no way from top to bottom does Pac have a tougher or better resume than Mayweather.......

                  Before 2003 can you name anyone on Pac's resume? Well he was 34-2 was already Ko'ed twice and was ONLY fighting scrubs in ASIA........post 2003 Other than fighting the 3 mexican legends...who else is on his resume? I think its totally unfair to rate Pac's resume with those 3 fighters (in which was a total of 6 fights) over Mayweather's resume that has many more recognizable names and world champs. Pac has over 50 fights (14 more than Mayweather) and yet Pacquiao doesnt have more NAMES ON HIS RESUME than Mayweather nor has he beat more World Champions than Mayweather....

                  ....with that being said...from the beginning of each of their careers from their first pro fight to now....who REALLY has the BETTER RESUME from Top to Bottom?

                  Hey Floyd's biggest nut hugger. Quit comparing a you Pac to a young Floyd because it's never going to be an actual basis of their greatness. If you'll use your common sense, you'll surely know why Pacquiao has been not so good as a youth.

                  He had no f'ing decent training goddamnit! The Philippine government rarely supports anything that has something to do with sports. He didn't have nobody but himself back then.

                  Floyd on the other hand, had his father and had a great country backing him up.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    floyd jr fought a lot of americans, so that means he fought more popular fighters?

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Moe Howard View Post
                      Floyd's fought a bunch of nobodies too. But his are worse cuz' he's doing it in the later portion of his career and charging ppv for it.

                      I answered your silly question.

                      EM, MAB, JMM>>>Anything Floyds ever done.
                      would u buy Pac-Marquez 3?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP