3 Questions for Haye Haters

**Freddy Krueger** · 11-09-2009, 07:04 PM

Originally posted by pcr405

I just dont understand why so manypeople are bitching about haye.

1) Are you bitter because you wanted haye to lose, if so why the **** would you want that.

2) Those calling haye a runner how many of his fights have you watched? At the moment i can only assume you've seen one.

3) How did you expect him to fight valuev and win?

Answers Please.

3) I expected him to beat Valuev more impressively then Holyfield did. And he didn't, Holyfield landed more per round and still got screwed by the judges. How come Haye does less work than a shot Holyfield yet gets the decision? Not saying he didn't win but it just doesn't make sense how Holyfield didn't get the decision in the Valuev fight.

Also brits are very annoying at hyping up a fighter like Haye who still has not proved **** or fought anyone with a pulse at heavyweight. Bragging about a win over a slow ass giant who was already schooled by a shot fighter in Holyfield.

And your other two questions are dumb, so I didn't respond to them because you're a sped.

**Boxing Scene** · 11-09-2009, 07:05 PM

Originally posted by pcr405

I just dont understand why so manypeople are bitching about haye.

1) Are you bitter because you wanted haye to lose, if so why the **** would you want that.
.

Of course I wanted Haye to lose. Why would I want to add another idiot to the rotation in the Valuev/Chagaev/Ruiz mandatory joke?

Originally posted by pcr405

2) Those calling haye a runner how many of his fights have you watched? At the moment i can only assume you've seen one.
.

Everyone's seen Haye's fights at Cruiserweight. At heavyweight he has a horrible record of beating a nobody in Barrett and he ran from the lightest punching heavyweight champion in a long time. Valuev is as bad as Byrd.

Originally posted by pcr405

3) How did you expect him to fight valuev and win?

.

Uh I expected him to fight like he said he was going to fight and not run and throw 5 punches per round. I can't see how anyone can support Froch winning and not have Valuev winning that fight whatsoever.

**The_Demon** · 11-09-2009, 07:08 PM

look at the haters
bless em

**Boxing Scene** · 11-09-2009, 07:09 PM

Originally posted by british_fan

look at the haters
bless em

Look at the nutswingers. I bless them all with their wanna be "heavyweight champion".

The WBA was a huge joke until Haye won it right, and he turned that all around in one night with track shoes.

**pcr405** · 11-09-2009, 07:11 PM

Haye did what was neccessary to win the fight. His aim wasnt to go out there and have a better performance then Holyfield. Its not hayes fault holyfield got the wrong decision.

Braddman hayes and frochs fights were completly different, and i dont know anybody whothought that both valuev and froch deserved to win anyways.

**The_Demon** · 11-09-2009, 07:11 PM

Originally posted by braddman

Look at the nutswingers. I bless them all with their wanna be "heavyweight champion".

The WBA was a huge joke until Haye won it right, and he turned that all around in one night with track shoes.

if you were a real boxing fan you would give credit where credits due
haye went over too germany and outboxed a beast with his weaker hand too take the belt
spend all the time you want discrediting the win,it wont change the fact that he is champion,you ****in prat

**WhoreUs** · 11-09-2009, 07:12 PM

Only complaint on that fight is that it was boring. Haye can make up for it by destroying Ruiz for us.

**Spray_resistant** · 11-09-2009, 07:15 PM

Originally posted by pcr405

I just dont understand why so manypeople are bitching about haye.

1) Are you bitter because you wanted haye to lose, if so why the **** would you want that.

2) Those calling haye a runner how many of his fights have you watched? At the moment i can only assume you've seen one.

3) How did you expect him to fight valuev and win?

Answers Please.

They are upset that they were not chosen by David to be one of the 20 men.

**slimshandy69** · 11-09-2009, 07:18 PM

Originally posted by pcr405

I just dont understand why so manypeople are bitching about haye.

1) Are you bitter because you wanted haye to lose, if so why the **** would you want that.

2) Those calling haye a runner how many of his fights have you watched? At the moment i can only assume you've seen one.

3) How did you expect him to fight valuev and win?

Answers Please.

i think freddycreuger(the poster) answered the points pretty well but ill have a bash..

1) I am bitter. As a froch im ****ing bitter, at not just haye but shamir khan. Both are poor fighters whove been knocked out by hasbeens..whereas froch has beaten pascal, taylor in america and the elusive dirrell and gets no credit. how can froch in a much strnger divsion get the genuwine WBC belt, and haye in the worst diviosn get the weakest belt yet get more crdit??makes no sense..

2) the cruiser weight division is arguebly ****ter than the heavy weight division. Enzo maac???That french guy who nearly ****** out haye was **** as well. Haye has had alot of lucky escapes, he ****ing chinny to say the least. Plus cuts very easily. Even against enzo after 2 rounds he was pouring with blood. He blatantly ducked the klits, but hes got no where to hide now...

3) i expected a knock out. This weight division bAR THE brillinat klitscho brothers(whom i think vatali is one of the greats) is shocking. Valuev is definately the worst heavyweight champ ever. And i agree with freddy that evander did a better job than haye. simple as.

David haye is a hype job. Hes the last ditch effort of a ****y boxer to liven up a division dominated by the eastern block. unfortunately these ukranians are terrifying and will literally kill haye.

3 Questions for Haye Haters