Who put on a better schooling?

[Walterson]

Dirrell on Froch or Haye on Valuez

let's here your thoughts!

[NakiFan]

Haye did, Haye didnt get hit with one power shot, got hit less than Direll and wobbled Valuev, Direll himself got wobbled and moaned to the ref!!

[S.G.]

I think Dirrell exploited gaps in Froch's defense better than Haye did Valuev, while Haye kept better composure and avoided being hit cleanly the whole night without excessive spoiling.

Froch and Valuev are two different boxers though; Valuev is rangy and awkward but offensively impotent - Froch is incredibly strong but crude and indisciplined.

[Akyra]

a better question would be, who put up the most boring performance.

now that'd be a tough one to answer!

[Walterson]

Haye did, Haye didnt get hit with one power shot, got hit less than Direll and wobbled Valuev, Direll himself got wobbled and moaned to the ref!!

Understand that, but Dirrell threw more stylistically and when he made Froch missed, he made him look bad.

Haye did show good evasive qualities I got to agree, Valuez could not pin him with the jab.

[-ALT-]

a better question would be, who put up the most boring performance.

now that'd be a tough one to answer!

Yeah, tough one that

[Calza appy]

Erm, Haye did becuase Haye won?

[apokalips]

Froch is better than Valuev...I believe that Dirrell displayed better offence than Haye did and had to be quicker movement wise to get away from Froch than Haye did with Valuev.

[lyrical]

This is the dumbest thread of the day,

Did Dirrell break his hand? No
was Dirrell fighting a giant? No

Yes he should have got the decision but Hayes performance was MUCH better

[BigTaco00]

Erm, Haye did becuase Haye won?

Lol that's the first thing that popped into my head. Haye beat a beast. Dirrell lost to a crude puncher.