santiago: Pacquiao will be beaten badly this saturday.

[IMDAZED]

it's the same old **** with a different stink. the only time there are new insights are when we see or hear things from the training camps. Don't think you're some kinda innovator.



for reals... I dunno why you guys get so emotional about a number.

Actually, it seems that number matters to you more than anyone. Whatever dude, I think everyone sees through the crap by now. Keep on.

[Ben d great]

Santiago said that in the last 24/7. i co-sign. there is no way at all that manny will beat Miguel, as a matter of fact, manny will be so badly beaten that he will not be able to fight again till at least june 2010, mark my words. all this image created by the media using Oscar/Hatton fights as a springboard to make predictions, will fall like the old Roman empire. COTTO BY KO.

I Dont think so, by Pac movements and speed cotto is in trouble the only chance for cotto to win is what they call "lucky punch", other than that nothing i like cotto when his fighting somebody but for a speedy left handed
like Pac he will be KOd. you can review cottos fight with southpaw his very hitable. Sori man we are in the same side before but not this time my prediction is Pac will win by KO in mid rounds probably seven.

[Zn1]

c'mon man... every ****ing pac/cotto thread is a rehash of old arguments!!!! I'm to lazy to be creative.

but still willing to read over those same arguments and comment on them.

honestly, you are made of fail [which is also a fail statement in itself]

[Pullcounter]

Actually, it seems that number matters to you more than anyone. Whatever dude, I think everyone sees through the crap by now. Keep on.

lolz... I say the number because I know it will get a response. someone needs to remiind people that there are weight divisions for a reason. no former 106 lber, no matter how elite he is, should be able to hang w/ an elite WW.

but still willing to read over those same arguments and comment on them.

honestly, you are made of fail [which is also a fail statement in itself]

of course! people rehash the same old arguments.... I just cut through the crap and get right to the heart of the argument... I don't make pretenses like some of these other guys.

[IMDAZED]

lolz... I say the number because I know it will get a response. someone needs to remiind people that there are weight divisions for a reason. no former 106 lber, no matter how elite he is, should be able to hang w/ an elite WW.



of course! people rehash the same old arguments.... I just cut through the crap and get right to the heart of the argument... I don't make pretenses like some of these other guys.

Well that's what makes Manny Pacquiao different. Again, the same argument could be made at 140, 135 whatever. If you're trying to emphasize the weight disparity then you're doing it rather foolishly. No welterweight champ should beat an elite light heavyweight (just look around today) yet Tommy Hearns did it to Virgil Hill. So spare us the "I get right to the heart of the argument" crap. You're still talking about a 15-year-old Pacquiao. You're almost there, only 15 more years to go.

[p4p-champ]

no former 106 lber, no matter how elite he is, should be able to hang w/ an elite WW.

But didn't they say that about De La Hoya and even hatton? Is it possible Pacman as grown into the weight?

So what your saying is that Pacman is going to get his ass whooped, right?

[IMDAZED]

But didn't they say that about De La Hoya and even hatton? Is it possible Pacman as grown into the weight?

So what your saying is that Pacman is going to get his ass whooped, right?

No, what he's saying is: If Cotto wins it means nothing. And if Pacquiao wins, Cotto is a bum.

Strange.

[Cachi Perez]

5th or 6th round KO for Cotto

[p4p-champ]

No, what he's saying is: If Cotto wins it means nothing. And if Pacquiao wins, Cotto is a bum.

Strange.

oh, lol. I just noticed the signature, I understand now.

[Pullcounter]

Well that's what makes Manny Pacquiao different. Again, the same argument could be made at 140, 135 whatever. If you're trying to emphasize the weight disparity then you're doing it rather foolishly. No welterweight champ should beat an elite light heavyweight (just look around today) yet Tommy Hearns did it to Virgil Hill. So spare us the "I get right to the heart of the argument" crap. You're still talking about a 15-year-old Pacquiao. You're almost there, only 15 more years to go.

no ****... that's why tommy hearns is an ATG... its not supposed to happen and when it does, it should amaze mutha****ers. but in general elite WWs shouldn't be losing to smaller fighters.

But didn't they say that about De La Hoya and even hatton? Is it possible Pacman as grown into the weight?

So what your saying is that Pacman is going to get his ass whooped, right?

1) who is they?

2) he's grown into 140 lbs.. not WW

3) yes, pac is too small and should lose to cotto