Better overall career: DLH or Tito?

**Stoppage** · 11-09-2009, 01:10 PM

I'd go with DLH. He's been a champion in six weight divisions, held 10 world titles and became the richest boxer of all-time.

**Toney Loc** · 11-09-2009, 01:11 PM

De La Hoya

**Ch@mpBox@PR** · 11-09-2009, 01:13 PM

Originally posted by Stoppage

I'd go with DLH. He's been a champion in six weight divisions, held 10 world titles and became the richest boxer of all-time.

This, althouh in a ATG basis, Tito>>>>>>>DLH!!!!!1

**djtmal** · 11-09-2009, 01:14 PM

tito's because he made oscar run when they fought and oscar never could live that one down...

**JakeNDaBox** · 11-09-2009, 01:15 PM

Financially - Oscar, though that was always going to be the case.

Achievements - Tito.

**Rabbit ♠** · 11-09-2009, 01:17 PM

This is gonna get ugly

**andres aza** · 11-09-2009, 01:32 PM

Originally posted by Stoppage

I'd go with DLH. He's been a champion in six weight divisions, held 10 world titles and became the richest boxer of all-time.

Hard to top that. If i could have either of their careers, I think I would go with DLH

**joartcc5** · 11-09-2009, 01:33 PM

Originally posted by andres aza

Both great fighters, but whose career was better?

DLH.

At the end of the day DLH had better results than Tito.

**joartcc5** · 11-09-2009, 01:34 PM

Originally posted by Ch@mpBox@PR

This, althouh in a ATG basis, Tito>>>>>>>DLH!!!!!1

Oh cmon!

Tito and DLH resume are comparable.

but DLH recieved better results out of it.

Comment